From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
"Ján Tomko" <jtomko@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL 3/5] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any machine
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:21:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoUJ9yfkjkAzMSOd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240517150227.32205-4-philmd@linaro.org>
Hi Michael,
This patch fixes a regression that was introduced in QEMU 9.0,
reported by yet another user at:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2420
Could you pull this patch into stable-9.0. If you think testing
is important for stable, the following patch adds further unit
testing coverage too.
Daniel
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 05:02:25PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>
> This effectively reverts
>
> commit 54c4ea8f3ae614054079395842128a856a73dbf9
> Author: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Sat Mar 9 00:01:37 2024 +0800
>
> hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" SMP configurations
>
> but is not done as a 'git revert' since the part of the changes to the
> file hw/core/machine-smp.c which add 'has_XXX' checks remain desirable.
> Furthermore, we have to tweak the subsequently added unit test to
> account for differing warning message.
>
> The rationale for the original deprecation was:
>
> "Currently, it was allowed for users to specify the unsupported
> topology parameter as "1". For example, x86 PC machine doesn't
> support drawer/book/cluster topology levels, but user could specify
> "-smp drawers=1,books=1,clusters=1".
>
> This is meaningless and confusing, so that the support for this kind
> of configurations is marked deprecated since 9.0."
>
> There are varying POVs on the topic of 'unsupported' topology levels.
>
> It is common to say that on a system without hyperthreading, that there
> is always 1 thread. Likewise when new CPUs introduced a concept of
> multiple "dies', it was reasonable to say that all historical CPUs
> before that implicitly had 1 'die'. Likewise for the more recently
> introduced 'modules' and 'clusters' parameter'. From this POV, it is
> valid to set 'parameter=1' on the -smp command line for any machine,
> only a value > 1 is strictly an error condition.
>
> It doesn't cause any functional difficulty for QEMU, because internally
> the QEMU code is itself assuming that all "unsupported" parameters
> implicitly have a value of '1'.
>
> At the libvirt level, we've allowed applications to set 'parameter=1'
> when configuring a guest, and pass that through to QEMU.
>
> Deprecating this creates extra difficulty for because there's no info
> exposed from QEMU about which machine types "support" which parameters.
> Thus, libvirt can't know whether it is valid to pass 'parameter=1' for
> a given machine type, or whether it will trigger deprecation messages.
>
> Since there's no apparent functional benefit to deleting this deprecated
> behaviour from QEMU, and it creates problems for consumers of QEMU,
> remove this deprecation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20240513123358.612355-2-berrange@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/core/machine-smp.c | 84 ++++++++++++-------------------------
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 8 ++--
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine-smp.c b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> index 2b93fa99c9..5d8d7edcbd 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> @@ -118,76 +118,46 @@ void machine_parse_smp_config(MachineState *ms,
> }
>
> /*
> - * If not supported by the machine, a topology parameter must be
> - * omitted.
> + * If not supported by the machine, a topology parameter must
> + * not be set to a value greater than 1.
> */
> - if (!mc->smp_props.modules_supported && config->has_modules) {
> - if (config->modules > 1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "modules not supported by this "
> - "machine's CPU topology");
> - return;
> - } else {
> - /* Here modules only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> - warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> - "Unsupported modules parameter mustn't be "
> - "specified as 1");
> - }
> + if (!mc->smp_props.modules_supported &&
> + config->has_modules && config->modules > 1) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "modules > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> + return;
> }
> modules = modules > 0 ? modules : 1;
>
> - if (!mc->smp_props.clusters_supported && config->has_clusters) {
> - if (config->clusters > 1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "clusters not supported by this "
> - "machine's CPU topology");
> - return;
> - } else {
> - /* Here clusters only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> - warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> - "Unsupported clusters parameter mustn't be "
> - "specified as 1");
> - }
> + if (!mc->smp_props.clusters_supported &&
> + config->has_clusters && config->clusters > 1) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "clusters > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> + return;
> }
> clusters = clusters > 0 ? clusters : 1;
>
> - if (!mc->smp_props.dies_supported && config->has_dies) {
> - if (config->dies > 1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "dies not supported by this "
> - "machine's CPU topology");
> - return;
> - } else {
> - /* Here dies only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> - warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> - "Unsupported dies parameter mustn't be "
> - "specified as 1");
> - }
> + if (!mc->smp_props.dies_supported &&
> + config->has_dies && config->dies > 1) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "dies > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> + return;
> }
> dies = dies > 0 ? dies : 1;
>
> - if (!mc->smp_props.books_supported && config->has_books) {
> - if (config->books > 1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "books not supported by this "
> - "machine's CPU topology");
> - return;
> - } else {
> - /* Here books only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> - warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> - "Unsupported books parameter mustn't be "
> - "specified as 1");
> - }
> + if (!mc->smp_props.books_supported &&
> + config->has_books && config->books > 1) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "books > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> + return;
> }
> books = books > 0 ? books : 1;
>
> - if (!mc->smp_props.drawers_supported && config->has_drawers) {
> - if (config->drawers > 1) {
> - error_setg(errp, "drawers not supported by this "
> - "machine's CPU topology");
> - return;
> - } else {
> - /* Here drawers only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> - warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> - "Unsupported drawers parameter mustn't be "
> - "specified as 1");
> - }
> + if (!mc->smp_props.drawers_supported &&
> + config->has_drawers && config->drawers > 1) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "drawers > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> + return;
> }
> drawers = drawers > 0 ? drawers : 1;
>
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> index 8994337e12..56165e6644 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> @@ -337,21 +337,21 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_invalid[] = {
> {
> /* config: -smp 2,dies=2 */
> .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_DIES(T, 2, F, 0, T, 2, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0),
> - .expect_error = "dies not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> + .expect_error = "dies > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> }, {
> /* config: -smp 2,clusters=2 */
> .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_CLUSTERS(T, 2, F, 0, T, 2, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0),
> - .expect_error = "clusters not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> + .expect_error = "clusters > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> }, {
> /* config: -smp 2,books=2 */
> .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_BOOKS_DRAWERS(T, 2, F, 0, T, 2, F,
> 0, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0),
> - .expect_error = "books not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> + .expect_error = "books > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> }, {
> /* config: -smp 2,drawers=2 */
> .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_BOOKS_DRAWERS(T, 2, T, 2, F, 0, F,
> 0, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0),
> - .expect_error = "drawers not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> + .expect_error = "drawers > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology",
> }, {
> /* config: -smp 8,sockets=2,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=8 */
> .config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, 8, T, 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 8),
> --
> 2.41.0
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-17 15:02 [PULL 0/5] Misc HW patches & fixes for 2024-05-17 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-17 15:02 ` [PULL 1/5] ui/console: Only declare variable fence_fd when CONFIG_GBM is defined Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-17 16:56 ` Kim, Dongwon
2024-05-17 15:02 ` [PULL 2/5] hw/pflash: fix block write start Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-17 15:02 ` [PULL 3/5] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any machine Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-07-03 8:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-07-03 8:39 ` Michael Tokarev
2024-05-17 15:02 ` [PULL 4/5] tests: add testing of parameter=1 for SMP topology Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-17 15:02 ` [PULL 5/5] tests: Gently exit from GDB when tests complete Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-18 13:26 ` [PULL 0/5] Misc HW patches & fixes for 2024-05-17 Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoUJ9yfkjkAzMSOd@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=jtomko@redhat.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).