From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"farosas@suse.de" <farosas@suse.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Wang, Lei4" <lei4.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] target/i386: kvm: Block migration when enfore_cpuid is set to false
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zo_owsKVk32F9lwb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR11MB63736018180E286CC7D36167DCA52@DS0PR11MB6373.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 02:13:31PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> On Thursday, July 11, 2024 8:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:10:34PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> > > On Thursday, July 11, 2024 7:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:49:12PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > AFAIK, many users are not aware of this, and also we couldn't assume
> > > everybody knows it. That's why we want to add the enforcement.
> >
> > Users who directly launch QEMU are expected to know about QEMU config
> > details for migration. If they don't, then they ought to be using a higher level
> > tool like libvirt, which ensures the configuration is migration compatible.
>
> Agree that libvirt has this advantage and is more user friendly. But it doesn't seem to
> solve the issue mentioned by this patch - if users don't explicitly set "enforce=true"
> in libvirt configs for the guest, then migrating the guest across hosts with different
> features could still be risky. Unless there is similar enforcement in libvirt to require
> users to set "enforce=true" for the guest to be migratable.
Yes, libvirt takes steps to ensure CPU compatibility before migrating.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 14:49 [PATCH v1] target/i386: kvm: Block migration when enfore_cpuid is set to false Wei Wang
2024-07-03 18:03 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-04 15:10 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-07-04 15:59 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-05 10:22 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-07-05 13:34 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-11 11:40 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-07-11 11:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-07-11 12:10 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-07-11 12:24 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-07-11 13:48 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-07-11 13:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-07-11 14:13 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-07-11 14:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-07-11 15:09 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-07-11 15:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zo_owsKVk32F9lwb@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=lei4.wang@intel.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).