From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52775C3DA4B for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sTKpa-0004GE-Gu; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:29:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sTKpR-0004Do-Fj; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:29:18 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.9]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sTKpP-0000lx-BE; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:29:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1721046555; x=1752582555; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=miQmptctDvyLsHlxDcDl05oZOCrd2/ChwcgEgwkHaSY=; b=I/4dK68YkTGmP7zhJIcPi2FdtJaZplGBQQ6VwEwSCm/cOP4HOz2vAWST 14E6eKItVlvibgxkUAw0cjHaoXNYIfzGSkIJX5OeJIaHGkMc0fUjDyAJK CZyBHlcNvOXB85spEFZT4+vyqmhIISg1FFpuLxefein4frU3cVypWhbGv KpSEdA4t2KB8XNTmroUAxTmd8wAyOcoBsWNZZERwNVoOlx9F2eXjuL9Ql shM5myXzRsmdE/lCVDc+qbq80HMbXFrQLcpgNZE6l15Ahx3AEtV6KlamS 8MSs23Eer6vaKRvJZ0zDs4W9HmdgsLbXPlA6xWfkUd+Eqt+puCfrRwb9a A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XMEfipIBRvaY2QTPig5oXw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fPibITHZRf2WHu7gYAJkTw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11133"; a="29101237" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,210,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="29101237" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jul 2024 05:29:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4FassazaS6CBTnaC9ALH8A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: d5R9Ej9kRfCkJTP2osMhWw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,210,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="54533618" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.36]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2024 05:29:08 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:44:49 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Michael Tokarev Cc: Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Laurent Vivier , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Markus Armbruster , Eric Blake , qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Amit Shah Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] backends/rng-random: Get rid of qemu_open_old() Message-ID: References: <20240715082155.28771-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <20240715082155.28771-8-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <01245850-b5df-4bf6-9a22-775d12fc07a0@linaro.org> <487ea08d-d374-4591-bb68-b29e50013864@tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <487ea08d-d374-4591-bb68-b29e50013864@tls.msk.ru> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.198.163.9; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:07:00PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:07:00 +0300 > From: Michael Tokarev > Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] backends/rng-random: Get rid of qemu_open_old() > > 15.07.2024 13:10, Zhao Liu wrote: > ... > > Thanks Philippe! I'll wait patch 1's comment, after that I can post a > > new version with the change you mentioned. > > I don't think either of this is necessary. Patch 1 LGTM, and I'll > drop the comment while applying. > Many thanks!