From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org,
Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] migration/multifd: Fix multifd_send_setup cleanup when channel creation fails
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 14:38:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqvWOEHfLCqnu4dP@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240801174101.31806-3-farosas@suse.de>
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 02:41:01PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> When a channel fails to create, the code currently just returns. This
> is wrong for two reasons:
>
> 1) Channel n+1 will not get to initialize it's semaphores, leading to
> an assert when terminate_threads tries to post to it:
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: ../util/qemu-thread-posix.c:92:
> qemu_mutex_lock_impl: Assertion `mutex->initialized' failed.
>
> 2) (theoretical) If channel n-1 already started creation it will
> defeat the purpose of the channels_created logic which is in place
> to avoid migrate_fd_cleanup() to run while channels are still being
> created.
>
> This cannot really happen today because the current failure cases
> for multifd_new_send_channel_create() are all synchronous,
> resulting from qio_channel_file_new_path() getting a bad
> filename. This would hit all channels equally.
>
> But I don't want to set a trap for future people, so have all
> channels try to create (even if failing), and only fail after the
> channels_created semaphore has been posted.
>
> While here, remove the error_report_err call. There's one already at
> migrate_fd_cleanup later on.
>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Reported-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
> Fixes: bd8b0a8f82 ("migration/multifd: Move multifd_send_setup error handling in to the function")
Should it be this one instead?
b7b03eb614 ("migration/multifd: Add outgoing QIOChannelFile support")
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
PS: what's your plan on your other multifd SendData series? I got a bit
overloaded on downstream stuff and I still have plenty review debts
recently (CPR one of them.. needs follow ups), so just to say I may delay a
bit on reading that one. I assume it's next-release stuff anyway, but let
me know otherwise.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-01 17:40 [PATCH 0/2] Multifd fixes Fabiano Rosas
2024-08-01 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] migration: Fix cleanup of iochannel in file migration Fabiano Rosas
2024-08-01 18:39 ` Peter Xu
2024-08-01 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] migration/multifd: Fix multifd_send_setup cleanup when channel creation fails Fabiano Rosas
2024-08-01 18:38 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-08-01 19:14 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-08-02 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] Multifd fixes Fabiano Rosas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqvWOEHfLCqnu4dP@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jfehlig@suse.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).