qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@daynix.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ebpf: add formal error reporting to all APIs
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 10:13:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrM6z0sO-ZNLf3Fw@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5403fa28-bc81-4208-9b16-7912a3b190c5@linaro.org>

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 09:37:00AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/8/24 17:20, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:11:55PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > On 6/8/24 16:56, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > The eBPF code is currently reporting error messages through trace
> > > > events. Trace events are fine for debugging, but they are not to be
> > > > considered the primary error reporting mechanism, as their output
> > > > is inaccessible to callers.
> > > > 
> > > > This adds an "Error **errp" parameter to all methods which have
> > > > important error scenarios to report to the caller.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    ebpf/ebpf_rss.c     | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > >    ebpf/ebpf_rss.h     | 10 +++++---
> > > >    hw/net/virtio-net.c |  7 +++---
> > > >    3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c b/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > > > index aa7170d997..59854c8b51 100644
> > > > --- a/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > > > +++ b/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > > > @@ -47,13 +47,14 @@ bool ebpf_rss_is_loaded(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > > >        return ctx != NULL && (ctx->obj != NULL || ctx->program_fd != -1);
> > > >    }
> > > > -static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > > > +static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx, Error **errp)
> > > >    {
> > > >        ctx->mmap_configuration = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > > >                                       PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
> > > >                                       ctx->map_configuration, 0);
> > > >        if (ctx->mmap_configuration == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > >            trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF configuration array");
> > > > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF configuration array");
> > > >            return false;
> > > >        }
> > > >        ctx->mmap_toeplitz_key = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > > > @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > > >                                       ctx->map_toeplitz_key, 0);
> > > >        if (ctx->mmap_toeplitz_key == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > >            trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF toeplitz key");
> > > > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF toeplitz array");
> > > >            goto toeplitz_fail;
> > > >        }
> > > >        ctx->mmap_indirections_table = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > > > @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > > >                                       ctx->map_indirections_table, 0);
> > > >        if (ctx->mmap_indirections_table == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > >            trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF indirection table");
> > > > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF indirection array");
> > > 
> > > Aren't these trace_ebpf_error() calls redundant now?
> > 
> > Yes & no. Errors propagated up the call stack don't get included in
> > any trace output, and so if a caller doesn't log them anywhere they
> > can thus be invisible to someone just looking at trace output.
> > 
> > I could remove them all from the eBPF code though, and put a single
> > trace event in the hw/net/virtio-net.c file instead ? Bit of a bike
> > shed colouring exercise to decide which is best though.
> 
> No problem, I'm fine with this patch.
> 
> Note from experience (although pre-existing in this patch), trace
> events can be very verbose, and a what makes them powerful is we
> can filter particular ones. The following pattern isn't practical
> to filter:
> 
>   trace_foo_error(const char *error_msg);
> 
> While a bit tedious to add, having a single trace event per error
> is way more useful.

Yeah, I agree with you on that. I should look at changing it to add
distinct error probes.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-07  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-06 14:56 [PATCH 0/5] Report fatal errors from failure with pre-opened eBPF RSS FDs Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-08-06 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/net: fix typo s/epbf/ebpf/ in virtio-net Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-08-06 15:10   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-08-06 14:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] ebpf: drop redundant parameter checks in static methods Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-08-06 14:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] ebpf: add formal error reporting to all APIs Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-08-06 15:11   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-08-06 15:20     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-08-07  7:37       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-08-07  7:39         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-08-07  9:13         ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-08-06 14:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/net: report errors from failing to use eBPF RSS FDs Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-08-06 14:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] ebpf: improve trace event coverage to all key operations Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZrM6z0sO-ZNLf3Fw@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew@daynix.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).