From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] softmmu/physmem: fix memory leak in dirty_memory_extend()
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:11:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zs9MRpTnGQ7opGed@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828090743.128647-1-david@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:07:43AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> As reported by Peter, we might be leaking memory when removing the
> highest RAMBlock (in the weird ram_addr_t space), and adding a new one.
>
> We will fail to realize that we already allocated bitmaps for more
> dirty memory blocks, and effectively discard the pointers to them.
>
> Fix it by getting rid of last_ram_page() and by remembering the number
> of dirty memory blocks that have been allocated already.
>
> While at it, let's use "unsigned int" for the number of blocks, which
> should be sufficient until we reach ~32 exabytes.
>
> Looks like this leak was introduced as we switched from using a single
> bitmap_zero_extend() to allocating multiple bitmaps:
> bitmap_zero_extend() relies on g_renew() which should have taken care of
> this.
>
> Resolves: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAFEAcA-k7a+VObGAfCFNygQNfCKL=AfX6A4kScq=VSSK0peqPg@mail.gmail.com
> Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Fixes: 5b82b703b69a ("memory: RCU ram_list.dirty_memory[] for safe RAM hotplug")
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Move the counter to RAMList
> * Use "unsigned int" instead of "ram_addr_t" as type for the number of
> blocks
Thanks. I'll pick this in the next pull if nobody disagrees (or beat me to
it).
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 9:07 [PATCH v2] softmmu/physmem: fix memory leak in dirty_memory_extend() David Hildenbrand
2024-08-28 16:11 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zs9MRpTnGQ7opGed@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).