From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
To: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, Alistair.Francis@wdc.com, bmeng.cn@gmail.com,
liwei1518@gmail.com, dbarboza@ventanamicro.com,
zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, jim.shu@sifive.com,
andy.chiu@sifive.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:35:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsRHPDG/GkyhdrQi@debug.ba.rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240820000129.3522346-12-debug@rivosinc.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 05:01:25PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>zicfiss protects shadow stack using new page table encodings PTE.W=0,
>PTE.R=0 and PTE.X=0. This encoding is reserved if zicfiss is not
>implemented or if shadow stack are not enabled.
>Loads on shadow stack memory are allowed while stores to shadow stack
>memory leads to access faults. Shadow stack accesses to RO memory
>leads to store page fault.
>
>To implement special nature of shadow stack memory where only selected
>stores (shadow stack stores from sspush) have to be allowed while rest
>of regular stores disallowed, new MMU TLB index is created for shadow
>stack.
>
>Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
>Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>---
>@@ -1406,6 +1431,11 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int size,
> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "%s ad %" VADDR_PRIx " rw %d mmu_idx %d\n",
> __func__, address, access_type, mmu_idx);
>
>+ /* If shadow stack instruction initiated this access, treat it as store */
>+ if (mmu_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
>+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
>+ }
>+
I think I forgot to address this. Do you still want me to fix this up like you
had suggested?
IIRC, you mentioned to use TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS=2. Honestly I don't know
what it means and how its used. Based on git grep and some readup, are you expecting something
along the below lines?
"""
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index fee31b8037..dfd2efa941 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState CPURISCVState;
* RISC-V-specific extra insn start words:
* 1: Original instruction opcode
*/
-#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 1
+#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 2
#define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index f74a1216b1..b266177e46 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -1271,6 +1271,11 @@ static void raise_mmu_exception(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong address,
{
CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
+ if (!pmp_violation &&
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] & 1) {
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] &= ~1;
+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
+ }
+
switch (access_type) {
case MMU_INST_FETCH:
if (pmp_violation) {
@@ -1433,7 +1438,7 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int size,
/* If shadow stack instruction initiated this access, treat it as store */
if (mmu_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
- access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] |= 1;
}
pmu_tlb_fill_incr_ctr(cpu, access_type);
@@ -1529,6 +1534,7 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int size,
if (ret == TRANSLATE_SUCCESS) {
tlb_set_page(cs, address & ~(tlb_size - 1), pa & ~(tlb_size - 1),
prot, mmu_idx, tlb_size);
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] &= ~1;
return true;
} else if (probe) {
"""
> pmu_tlb_fill_incr_ctr(cpu, access_type);
> if (two_stage_lookup) {
> /* Two stage lookup */
>diff --git a/target/riscv/internals.h b/target/riscv/internals.h
>index 0ac17bc5ad..ddbdee885b 100644
>--- a/target/riscv/internals.h
>+++ b/target/riscv/internals.h
>@@ -30,12 +30,15 @@
> * - U+2STAGE 0b100
> * - S+2STAGE 0b101
> * - S+SUM+2STAGE 0b110
>+ * - Shadow stack+U 0b1000
>+ * - Shadow stack+S 0b1001
> */
> #define MMUIdx_U 0
> #define MMUIdx_S 1
> #define MMUIdx_S_SUM 2
> #define MMUIdx_M 3
> #define MMU_2STAGE_BIT (1 << 2)
>+#define MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE (1 << 3)
>
> static inline int mmuidx_priv(int mmu_idx)
> {
>--
>2.44.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-20 0:01 [PATCH v5 00/15] riscv support for control flow integrity extensions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] target/riscv: Add zicfilp extension Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] target/riscv: Introduce elp state and enabling controls for zicfilp Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:17 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] target/riscv: save and restore elp state on priv transitions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] target/riscv: additional code information for sw check Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:24 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracking Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:29 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] disas/riscv: enable `lpad` disassembly Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] target/riscv: Add zicfiss extension Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] target/riscv: introduce ssp and enabling controls for zicfiss Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:34 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] target/riscv: tb flag for shadow stack instructions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 7:35 ` Deepak Gupta [this message]
2024-08-20 9:20 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 18:55 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 19:45 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 22:33 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] target/riscv: implement zicfiss instructions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] target/riscv: compressed encodings for sspush and sspopchk Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for zicfiss instructions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for compressed sspush/sspopchk Deepak Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsRHPDG/GkyhdrQi@debug.ba.rivosinc.com \
--to=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
--cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
--cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=jim.shu@sifive.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
--cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).