From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
Alistair.Francis@wdc.com, bmeng.cn@gmail.com,
liwei1518@gmail.com, dbarboza@ventanamicro.com,
zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, jim.shu@sifive.com,
andy.chiu@sifive.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:55:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsTmibCvaZJpEAPO@debug.ba.rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0afdd87-71c1-4b02-a2fb-5c9349205d8f@linaro.org>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 07:20:48PM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
>On 8/20/24 17:35, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>>+ /* If shadow stack instruction initiated this access, treat it as store */
>>>+ if (mmu_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
>>>+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
>>>+ }
>>>+
>>
>>I think I forgot to address this. Do you still want me to fix this up like you
>>had suggested?
>
>Yes, this still needs fixing.
>
>
>>IIRC, you mentioned to use TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS=2. Honestly I don't know
>>what it means and how its used. Based on git grep and some readup,
>>are you expecting something
>>along the below lines?
>>
>>
>>"""
>>
>>diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>>index fee31b8037..dfd2efa941 100644
>>--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
>>+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>>@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState CPURISCVState;
>> * RISC-V-specific extra insn start words:
>> * 1: Original instruction opcode
>> */
>>-#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 1
>>+#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 2
>>
>> #define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
>>
>>diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>index f74a1216b1..b266177e46 100644
>>--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
>>@@ -1271,6 +1271,11 @@ static void raise_mmu_exception(CPURISCVState
>>*env, target_ulong address,
>> {
>> CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
>>
>>+ if (!pmp_violation &&
>>+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] & 1) {
>>+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] &= ~1;
>>+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
>>+ }
>
>The first thing to understand is that the unwind data is stored by the
>compiler and recovered by the unwinder.
>
>The unwind data is exposed to the target via one of two methods:
>
>(1) TCGCPUOps.restore_state_to_opc, i.e. riscv_restore_state_to_opc.
> The data[] argument contains the extra words.
>
> With this method, the extra words are restored to env and are
> available in a later call to riscv_cpu_do_interrupt.
> Compare env->bins from the first extra word, which is used exactly so.
>
> This is probably the easiest and best option.
> You'd promote LOAD* to STORE_AMO* while dispatching the interrupt.
>
>(2) cpu_unwind_state_data()
>
> With this method, you have immediate access to the extra words,
> and don't need to store them anywhere else.
>
> This is supposed to be used when we are *not* going to raise
> an exception, merely look something up and continue execution.
> Otherwise, we'd be performing the unwind operation twice,
> and it's not cheap.
>
>So, tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[] is not something you'd ever touch,
>and this is the wrong spot to do anything.
Thanks for more information and guiding me through this.
Not going to say that I still understand everything. But I looked
at one arm example. Before I do something more with it. I wanted to run
it by you.
Something on the below lines? I've one question as well for you in comment.
""""
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index fee31b8037..b4e04fe849 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -46,8 +46,14 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState CPURISCVState;
/*
* RISC-V-specific extra insn start words:
* 1: Original instruction opcode
+ * 2: more information about instruction
*/
-#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 1
+#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 2
+
+/*
+ * b0: Whether a shadow stack operation/instruction or not.
+ */
+#define RISCV_INSN_START_WORD2_SS_OP 1
#define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
@@ -226,6 +232,7 @@ struct CPUArchState {
bool elp;
/* shadow stack register for zicfiss extension */
target_ulong ssp;
+ bool ss_op;
/* sw check code for sw check exception */
target_ulong sw_check_code;
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index f74a1216b1..c28b13d42c 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -1777,6 +1777,10 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
target_ulong mtval2 = 0;
if (!async) {
+ /* shadow stack op, promote load page fault to store page fault */
+ if (env->ss_op && cause == RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT) {
+ cause = RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT;
+ }
/* set tval to badaddr for traps with address information */
switch (cause) {
case RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST:
diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index 4da26cb926..c0f21fe3db 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void riscv_restore_state_to_opc(CPUState *cs,
env->pc = pc;
}
env->bins = data[1];
+ env->ss_op = data[2] & RISCV_INSN_START_WORD2_SS_OP;
}
static const TCGCPUOps riscv_tcg_ops = {
diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
index 580aa23c5b..6f952db823 100644
--- a/target/riscv/translate.c
+++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ static void riscv_tr_insn_start(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
pc_next &= ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
}
- tcg_gen_insn_start(pc_next, 0);
+ tcg_gen_insn_start(pc_next, 0, 0);
ctx->insn_start_updated = false;
}
@@ -1301,6 +1301,14 @@ static void riscv_tr_translate_insn(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
}
+ /* shadow stack index means shadow stack instruction is translated */
+ if (ctx->mem_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
+ /* Is this needed to set true? */
+ ctx->insn_start_updated = true;
+ tcg_set_insn_start_param(ctx->base.insn_start, 2,
+ RISCV_INSN_START_WORD2_SS_OP);
+ }
+
/* Only the first insn within a TB is allowed to cross a page boundary. */
if (ctx->base.is_jmp == DISAS_NEXT) {
if (ctx->itrigger || !is_same_page(&ctx->base, ctx->base.pc_next)) {
"""
>
>
>r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-20 0:01 [PATCH v5 00/15] riscv support for control flow integrity extensions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] target/riscv: Add zicfilp extension Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] target/riscv: Introduce elp state and enabling controls for zicfilp Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:17 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] target/riscv: save and restore elp state on priv transitions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] target/riscv: additional code information for sw check Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:24 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracking Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:29 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] disas/riscv: enable `lpad` disassembly Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] target/riscv: Add zicfiss extension Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] target/riscv: introduce ssp and enabling controls for zicfiss Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 5:34 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] target/riscv: tb flag for shadow stack instructions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 7:35 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 9:20 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 18:55 ` Deepak Gupta [this message]
2024-08-20 19:45 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 22:33 ` Richard Henderson
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] target/riscv: implement zicfiss instructions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] target/riscv: compressed encodings for sspush and sspopchk Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for zicfiss instructions Deepak Gupta
2024-08-20 0:01 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for compressed sspush/sspopchk Deepak Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsTmibCvaZJpEAPO@debug.ba.rivosinc.com \
--to=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
--cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
--cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=jim.shu@sifive.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
--cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).