From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: flakiness on CI jobs run via k8s
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:24:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuqcRvjd9f3YGutx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9ZsxwZb_=A15pUXDF+HH=sD-B8zm1j8MMJ-mPsZNP62Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 04:48:45PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> I notice that a lot of the CI job flakiness I'm seeing with main
> CI runs involves jobs that are run via the k8s runners. Notably
> cross-i686-tci and cross-i686-system and cross-i686-user are like this.
> These jobs run with no flakiness that I've noticed when they're run
> by an individual gitlab user (in which case they're not running on
> k8s, I believe). So something seems to be up with the environment
> we're using to run the jobs for the main CI. My impression is that
> the time things take to run can be very variable, especially if the
> CI job believes the reported number of CPUs and actually tries to run
> 8 or 9 test cases in parallel.
>
> Any ideas what might be causing issues here, or config tweaks
> we might be able to make to ensure that the environment reports
> to the CI job a number of CPUs/etc that accurately reflects
> the amount of resource it really has?
Didn't we change the hosting for our k8s runners recently ? They were
running on Azure, but I vaguely recall hearing that it was being
switched again.
Anyway, perhaps the cloud provider is over-committing the env such
that we have excessive streal time and thus not getting the full
power of the CPUs we expect. I know gitlab's own public runners
will suffer from this periodically, due to the very cheap VMs they
host on.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-18 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 15:48 flakiness on CI jobs run via k8s Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 9:24 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuqcRvjd9f3YGutx@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).