qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
	"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
	"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	"Yongwei Ma" <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:27:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxEs3DGGgCqGT5yK@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012104429.1048908-7-zhao1.liu@intel.com>

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 06:44:28PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Allow user to configure l1d, l1i, l2 and l3 cache topologies for PC
> machine.
> 
> Additionally, add the document of "-machine smp-cache" in
> qemu-options.hx.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes since Patch v2:
>  * Polished the document. (Jonathan)
> 
> Changes since Patch v1:
>  * Merged document into this patch. (Markus)
> 
> Changes since RFC v2:
>  * Used cache_supported array.
> ---
>  hw/i386/pc.c    |  4 ++++
>  qemu-options.hx | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>              -machine cxl-fmw.0.targets.0=cxl.0,cxl-fmw.0.targets.1=cxl.1,cxl-fmw.0.size=128G,cxl-fmw.0.interleave-granularity=512
> +
> +    ``smp-cache.0.cache=cachename,smp-cache.0.topology=topologylevel``
> +        Define cache properties for SMP system.
> +
> +        ``cache=cachename`` specifies the cache that the properties will be
> +        applied on. This field is the combination of cache level and cache
> +        type. It supports ``l1d`` (L1 data cache), ``l1i`` (L1 instruction
> +        cache), ``l2`` (L2 unified cache) and ``l3`` (L3 unified cache).
> +
> +        ``topology=topologylevel`` sets the cache topology level. It accepts
> +        CPU topology levels including ``thread``, ``core``, ``module``,
> +        ``cluster``, ``die``, ``socket``, ``book``, ``drawer`` and a special
> +        value ``default``. If ``default`` is set, then the cache topology will
> +        follow the architecture's default cache topology model. If another
> +        topology level is set, the cache will be shared at corresponding CPU
> +        topology level. For example, ``topology=core`` makes the cache shared
> +        by all threads within a core.
> +
> +        Example:
> +
> +        ::
> +
> +            -machine smp-cache.0.cache=l1d,smp-cache.0.topology=core,smp-cache.1.cache=l1i,smp-cache.1.topology=core

There are 4 cache types, l1d, l1i, l2, l3.

In this example you've only set properties for l1d, l1i caches.

What does this mean for l2 / l3 caches ?

Are they reported as not existing, or are they to be reported at
some built-in default topology level. If the latter, how does the
user know what that built-in default is, and avoid nonsense like
l1d being at socket level, and l3 being at the core level ? Can
we explicitly disable a l2/l3 cache, or must it always exists ?

The QAPI has an "invalid" topology level. You've not documented
that as permitted here, but the qapi parser will happily allow
it. What semantics will that have ? 

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-17 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-12 10:44 [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
     [not found]   ` <20241017095227.00006d85@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 13:20     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-17 14:51       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:30   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18  2:36     ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-18  7:55       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18  9:01         ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 16:19   ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-10-18  4:26     ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:27   ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-10-18  3:57     ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-18  7:58       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18  9:03         ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 13:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-17 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Jonathan Cameron via
     [not found] ` <20241017141402.0000135b@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 15:01   ` Zhao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZxEs3DGGgCqGT5yK@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).