From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Mark Cave-Ayland" <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Juraj Marcin" <jmarcin@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] qom: TYPE_SINGLETON interface
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:21:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxvFiGvkxm6lAwrY@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69eef5ad-93e3-4e6f-82c0-e8ee627128d4@linaro.org>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:11:51PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 24/10/24 17:53, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:02:19PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Hi, Phil,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick reviews!
> >
> > >
> > > (Cc'ing Mark)
> > >
> > > On 24/10/24 13:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/qom/object_interfaces.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > qom/object.c | 3 +++
> > > > qom/object_interfaces.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > qom/qom-qmp-cmds.c | 22 ++++++++++++---
> > > > system/qdev-monitor.c | 7 +++++
> > > > 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * SingletonClass:
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @parent_class: the base class
> > > > + * @get_instance: fetch the singleton instance if it is created,
> > > > + * NULL otherwise.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Singleton class describes the type of object classes that can only
> > > > + * provide one instance for the whole lifecycle of QEMU. It will fail the
> > > > + * operation if one attemps to create more than one instance.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * One can fetch the single object using class's get_instance() callback if
> > > > + * it was created before. This can be useful for operations like QMP
> > > > + * qom-list-properties, where dynamically creating an object might not be
> > > > + * feasible.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct SingletonClass {
> > > > + /* <private> */
> > > > + InterfaceClass parent_class;
> > > > + /* <public> */
> > > > + Object *(*get_instance)(Error **errp);
> > >
> > > IMHO asking get_instance() is overkill ...
> > >
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * object_class_is_singleton:
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @class: the class to detect singleton
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Returns: true if it's a singleton class, false otherwise.
> > > > + */
> > > > +bool object_class_is_singleton(ObjectClass *class);
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * singleton_get_instance:
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @class: the class to fetch singleton instance
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Returns: the object* if the class is a singleton class and the singleton
> > > > + * object is created, NULL otherwise.
> > > > + */
> > > > +Object *singleton_get_instance(ObjectClass *class);
> > > > +
> > > > #endif
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/qom/object_interfaces.c b/qom/object_interfaces.c
> > > > index e0833c8bfe..6766060d0a 100644
> > > > --- a/qom/object_interfaces.c
> > > > +++ b/qom/object_interfaces.c
> > > > @@ -354,6 +354,23 @@ void user_creatable_cleanup(void)
> > > > object_unparent(object_get_objects_root());
> > > > }
> > > > +bool object_class_is_singleton(ObjectClass *class)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return !!object_class_dynamic_cast(class, TYPE_SINGLETON);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +Object *singleton_get_instance(ObjectClass *class)
> > > > +{
> > >
> > > ... when we can use object_resolve_type_unambiguous:
> > >
> > > return object_resolve_type_unambiguous(object_class_get_name(class,
> > > NULL));
> >
> > I think an issue is migration object is nowhere to be find under
> > object_get_root(), so it won't work there. A side benefit is, it's also
> > faster..
>
> Maybe a simpler alternative is to add a field in ObjectClass, maintain
> a single GHashTable to store TypeName -> Instance and retrieve as:
>
> Object *singleton_get_instance(ObjectClass *class)
> {
> return g_hash_table_lookup(&singletons,
> object_class_get_name(class));
> }
This may need some proper locking too as Markus pointed out, so that the
object needs to boost its refcount before returned. It might be a problem
if the singleton class has its own locking.. I'll need to think about it.
In migration's case, there's going to be a new migration mutex protecting
the singleton object being updated (not included in this series, posted
elsewhere [1]).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024213056.1395400-9-peterx@redhat.com
>
> TBH the TYPE_SINGLETON interface seems a bit over-engineered and its
> implementation error prone.
Please feel free to suggest something else if you come up with.
The issue so far is qom/device-list-properties now can randomly create
migration object, which is defined to be global, while the plan is we need
to do something tricky in instance_finalize() for migration object (operate
on global vars; which is tricky but it could solve some issue we
encounter), so we must make sure it's never created more than once.
Thanks,
>
> > How about I use object_resolve_type_unambiguous() as a fallback? Then it's
> > used only if get_instance() is not provided.
> >
> > >
> > > BTW should we pass Error** argument to singleton_get_instance()?
> >
> > I didn't expect it to fail, hence I didn't even add it to make it more like
> > "this will always success or it asserts" kind of things. I left Error** in
> > the hook just to be slightly flexible, but I always pass in error_abort()
> > in this patch.
> >
> > I can either add Error** if anyone thinks it useful, or even drop Error**
> > in ->get_instance() since it's mostly not used at least for now.
> >
> > Let me know!
> >
> > >
> > > > + SingletonClass *singleton =
> > > > + (SingletonClass *)object_class_dynamic_cast(class, TYPE_SINGLETON);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!singleton) {
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return singleton->get_instance(&error_abort);
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Alternatively call object_resolve_type_unambiguous() in instance_init()?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 16:56 [PATCH 0/4] QOM: Singleton interface Peter Xu
2024-10-24 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] qom: TYPE_SINGLETON interface Peter Xu
2024-10-24 20:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-10-24 20:53 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-25 15:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-10-25 16:21 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-10-25 8:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-10-25 15:17 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-25 9:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-25 16:17 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-25 16:22 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-25 22:10 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 0:01 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-25 16:37 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-24 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/iommu: Make x86-iommu a singleton object Peter Xu
2024-10-25 9:25 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-10-25 21:55 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-25 22:13 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-07 11:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-11-07 15:29 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-08 8:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-10-29 10:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-29 14:32 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-24 16:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] migration: Make migration object " Peter Xu
2024-10-24 19:20 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-10-24 16:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] migration: Reset current_migration properly Peter Xu
2024-10-24 19:34 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-10-24 20:15 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-24 20:51 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-10-25 7:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] QOM: Singleton interface Markus Armbruster
2024-10-25 15:01 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 10:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-29 14:45 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 16:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-29 17:05 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 17:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-12-11 8:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-12-11 22:10 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxvFiGvkxm6lAwrY@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@treblig.org \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).