qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Prasad Pandit <ppandit@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
	Prasad Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] migration/postcopy: magic value for postcopy channel
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:18:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZykB3voFw_-ByWfh@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE8KmOyzWRqpGDOyAK7V2X8+SWVt_kR1897tiFm7vdBNRRE2QA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:02:33PM +0530, Prasad Pandit wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 20:04, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > As we discussed internally, we can't do this unconditionally.  We at least
> > some compat properties.
> 
> * ie. we define a new compat property to check if postcopy sends a
> magic value or not?
> 
> >  Or we need to see whether Fabiano's handshake can
> > simplify this, because the handshake will also re-design the channel
> > establishment protocol.
> 
> * May I know more about this handshake change? Is there a repository?
> OR a page/document that describes what is being planned? Is it just
> channel establishment change or there's more to it?

After a 2nd thought, maybe we don't need a new compat property, and this
should work even before handshake ready.

Firstly, we'll need a way to tell mgmt that the new qemu binary supports
enablement of both multifd + postcopy feature.  That can be done with a

  "features": [ "postcopy-with-multifd-precopy" ]

Flag attached to the QMP "migrate" command.

Then, I think we don't need a magic for preempt channel, because new qemu
binaries (after 7.2) have no issue on out-of-order connections between main
/ preempt channel.  Preempt channel is always connected later than main.

It means in the test logic of "which channel is which", it should be:

  - If it's a multifd channel (check multifd header match), it's a multifd
    channel, otherwise,

    - if main channel is not present yet, it must be the main channel (and
      we can double check the main channel magic), otherwise,

    - it's the preempt channel

With that, I think we can drop the new magic sent here.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 15:09 [PATCH 0/5] Allow to enable multifd and postcopy migration together Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] migration/multifd: move macros to multifd header Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] migration/postcopy: magic value for postcopy channel Prasad Pandit
     [not found]   ` <ZyTnBwpOwXcHGGPJ@x1n>
2024-11-04 12:32     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:18       ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-11-05 11:19         ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 13:00           ` Peter Xu
2024-11-06 12:19             ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-06 13:11               ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-07 12:05                 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-07 12:11                   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-07 12:33                   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-07 16:17                     ` Peter Xu
2024-11-07 16:57                       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-07 17:45                         ` Peter Xu
2024-11-08 12:37                           ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-08 13:25                             ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-06 16:00               ` Peter Xu
2024-11-07 11:52                 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-07 15:56                   ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] migration: remove multifd check with postcopy Prasad Pandit
     [not found]   ` <ZyTnWYyHlrJUYQRB@x1n>
2024-11-04 12:23     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 16:52       ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05  9:50         ` Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] migration: refactor ram_save_target_page functions Prasad Pandit
     [not found]   ` <ZyToBbvfWkIZ_40W@x1n>
2024-11-04 11:56     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:00       ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05 10:01         ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 13:01           ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] migration: enable multifd and postcopy together Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:48   ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05 11:54     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 16:55       ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZykB3voFw_-ByWfh@x1n \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=pjp@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).