From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Prasad Pandit <ppandit@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
Prasad Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] migration/postcopy: magic value for postcopy channel
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:18:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZykB3voFw_-ByWfh@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE8KmOyzWRqpGDOyAK7V2X8+SWVt_kR1897tiFm7vdBNRRE2QA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:02:33PM +0530, Prasad Pandit wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 20:04, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > As we discussed internally, we can't do this unconditionally. We at least
> > some compat properties.
>
> * ie. we define a new compat property to check if postcopy sends a
> magic value or not?
>
> > Or we need to see whether Fabiano's handshake can
> > simplify this, because the handshake will also re-design the channel
> > establishment protocol.
>
> * May I know more about this handshake change? Is there a repository?
> OR a page/document that describes what is being planned? Is it just
> channel establishment change or there's more to it?
After a 2nd thought, maybe we don't need a new compat property, and this
should work even before handshake ready.
Firstly, we'll need a way to tell mgmt that the new qemu binary supports
enablement of both multifd + postcopy feature. That can be done with a
"features": [ "postcopy-with-multifd-precopy" ]
Flag attached to the QMP "migrate" command.
Then, I think we don't need a magic for preempt channel, because new qemu
binaries (after 7.2) have no issue on out-of-order connections between main
/ preempt channel. Preempt channel is always connected later than main.
It means in the test logic of "which channel is which", it should be:
- If it's a multifd channel (check multifd header match), it's a multifd
channel, otherwise,
- if main channel is not present yet, it must be the main channel (and
we can double check the main channel magic), otherwise,
- it's the preempt channel
With that, I think we can drop the new magic sent here.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-04 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 15:09 [PATCH 0/5] Allow to enable multifd and postcopy migration together Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] migration/multifd: move macros to multifd header Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] migration/postcopy: magic value for postcopy channel Prasad Pandit
[not found] ` <ZyTnBwpOwXcHGGPJ@x1n>
2024-11-04 12:32 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:18 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-11-05 11:19 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 13:00 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-06 12:19 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-06 13:11 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-07 12:05 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-07 12:11 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-07 12:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-07 16:17 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-07 16:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-07 17:45 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-08 12:37 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-08 13:25 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-06 16:00 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-07 11:52 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-07 15:56 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] migration: remove multifd check with postcopy Prasad Pandit
[not found] ` <ZyTnWYyHlrJUYQRB@x1n>
2024-11-04 12:23 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 16:52 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05 9:50 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] migration: refactor ram_save_target_page functions Prasad Pandit
[not found] ` <ZyToBbvfWkIZ_40W@x1n>
2024-11-04 11:56 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:00 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05 10:01 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 13:01 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] migration: enable multifd and postcopy together Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:48 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05 11:54 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 16:55 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZykB3voFw_-ByWfh@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=pjp@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).