From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Juraj Marcin" <jmarcin@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] qom: Make container_get() strict to always walk or return container
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:03:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzxianGKK71p0yA1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241118221330.3480246-6-peterx@redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:13:30PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> When used incorrectly, container_get() can silently create containers even
> if the caller may not intend to do so. Add a rich document describing the
> helper, as container_get() should only be used in path lookups.
>
> Add one object_dynamic_cast() check to make sure whatever objects the
> helper walks will be a container object (including the one to be returned).
> It is a programming error otherwise, hence assert that.
>
> It may make container_get() tiny slower than before, but the hope is the
> change is neglictable, as object_class_dynamic_cast() has a fast path just
> for similar leaf use case.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pln6ds8q.fsf@pond.sub.org
> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> qom/container.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/qom/container.c b/qom/container.c
> index cfec92a944..ff6e35f837 100644
> --- a/qom/container.c
> +++ b/qom/container.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,20 @@ static void container_register_types(void)
> type_register_static(&container_info);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * container_get(): Get the container object under specific path
> + *
> + * @root: The root path object to start walking from. When starting from
> + * root, one can pass in object_get_root().
> + * @path: The sub-path to lookup, must be an non-empty string starts with "/".
> + *
> + * Returns: The container object specified by @path.
> + *
> + * NOTE: the function may impplicitly create internal containers when the
> + * whole path is not yet created. It's the caller's responsibility to make
> + * sure the path specified is always used as object containers, rather than
> + * any other type of objects.
> + */
The docs are a welcome addition, but at the same time the docs won't get
read most of the time.
With this in mind, IMHO, it is a conceptually *terrible* design for us to
have a method called "get" which magically *creates* stuff as a side-effect
of its calling. We'd be well served by fixing that design problem.
If I look in the code at what calls we have to container_get, and more
specifically what "path" values we pass, there are not actually that many:
/objects
/chardevs
/unattached
/machine
/peripheral
/peripheral-anon
/backend
/dr-connector
Ignoring the last one, those other 7 containers are things we expect
to exist in *every* system emulator.
Second, every single one of them is a single level deep. IOW, the for()
loop in container_get is effectively pointless.
We can fix this by having a single method:
void container_create_builtin(Object *root)
which creates the 7 built-in standard containers we expect
everywhere, with open coded object_new + add_child calls.
Then all current users of container_get() can switch over
to object_resolve_path, and container_get() can be eliminated.
The 'dr-connector' creation can just be open-coded using
object_new() in the spapr code.
> Object *container_get(Object *root, const char *path)
> {
> Object *obj, *child;
> @@ -31,6 +45,7 @@ Object *container_get(Object *root, const char *path)
> int i;
>
> parts = g_strsplit(path, "/", 0);
> + /* "path" must be an non-empty string starting with "/" */
> assert(parts != NULL && parts[0] != NULL && !parts[0][0]);
> obj = root;
>
> @@ -40,6 +55,12 @@ Object *container_get(Object *root, const char *path)
> child = object_new(TYPE_CONTAINER);
> object_property_add_child(obj, parts[i], child);
> object_unref(child);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Each object within the path must be a container object
> + * itself, including the object to be returned.
> + */
> + assert(object_dynamic_cast(child, TYPE_CONTAINER));
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.45.0
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-18 22:13 [PATCH 0/5] QOM: Enforce container_get() to operate on containers only Peter Xu
2024-11-18 22:13 ` [PATCH 1/5] qom: Add TYPE_CONTAINER macro Peter Xu
2024-11-19 9:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-19 19:52 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-18 22:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] ppc/e500: Avoid abuse of container_get() Peter Xu
2024-11-18 22:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] qdev: Make device_set_realized() always safe in tests Peter Xu
2024-11-19 9:46 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-19 20:14 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-18 22:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] qdev: Make qdev_get_machine() not use container_get() Peter Xu
2024-11-18 22:13 ` [PATCH 5/5] qom: Make container_get() strict to always walk or return container Peter Xu
2024-11-18 23:06 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-19 8:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-19 20:06 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-19 20:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-19 21:43 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-20 11:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-20 16:24 ` Peter Xu
2024-11-19 10:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-11-19 20:25 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzxianGKK71p0yA1@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).