qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manish.mishra" <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, berrange@redhat.com,
	prerna.saxena@nutanix.com, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] migration: check magic value for deciding the mapping of channels
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 23:29:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a027006d-48f7-4d8d-465a-a726bbdc6fbf@nutanix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3POFd+LFuxW8w21@x1n>


On 15/11/22 11:06 pm, Peter Xu wrote:
> Hi, Manish,
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 04:51:59PM +0000, manish.mishra wrote:
>> Current logic assumes that channel connections on the destination side are
>> always established in the same order as the source and the first one will
>> always be the main channel followed by the multifid or post-copy
>> preemption channel. This may not be always true, as even if a channel has a
>> connection established on the source side it can be in the pending state on
>> the destination side and a newer connection can be established first.
>> Basically causing out of order mapping of channels on the destination side.
>> Currently, all channels except post-copy preempt send a magic number, this
>> patch uses that magic number to decide the type of channel. This logic is
>> applicable only for precopy(multifd) live migration, as mentioned, the
>> post-copy preempt channel does not send any magic number. Also, tls live
>> migrations already does tls handshake before creating other channels, so
>> this issue is not possible with tls, hence this logic is avoided for tls
>> live migrations. This patch uses MSG_PEEK to check the magic number of
>> channels so that current data/control stream management remains
>> un-effected.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: manish.mishra <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>
>>
>> v2:
>>    TLS does not support MSG_PEEK, so V1 was broken for tls live
>>    migrations. For tls live migration, while initializing main channel
>>    tls handshake is done before we can create other channels, so this
>>    issue is not possible for tls live migrations. In V2 added a check
>>    to avoid checking magic number for tls live migration and fallback
>>    to older method to decide mapping of channels on destination side.
>> ---
>>   include/io/channel.h     | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   io/channel-socket.c      | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   io/channel.c             | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   migration/migration.c    | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   migration/multifd.c      | 12 ++++-------
>>   migration/multifd.h      |  2 +-
>>   migration/postcopy-ram.c |  5 +----
>>   migration/postcopy-ram.h |  2 +-
>>   8 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/io/channel.h b/include/io/channel.h
>> index c680ee7480..74177aeeea 100644
>> --- a/include/io/channel.h
>> +++ b/include/io/channel.h
>> @@ -115,6 +115,10 @@ struct QIOChannelClass {
>>                           int **fds,
>>                           size_t *nfds,
>>                           Error **errp);
>> +    ssize_t (*io_read_peek)(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> +                            void *buf,
>> +                            size_t nbytes,
>> +                            Error **errp);
>>       int (*io_close)(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>                       Error **errp);
>>       GSource * (*io_create_watch)(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> @@ -475,6 +479,27 @@ int qio_channel_write_all(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>                             size_t buflen,
>>                             Error **errp);
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * qio_channel_read_peek_all:
>> + * @ioc: the channel object
>> + * @buf: the memory region to read in data
>> + * @nbytes: the number of bytes to read
>> + * @errp: pointer to a NULL-initialized error object
>> + *
>> + * Read given @nbytes data from peek of channel into
>> + * memory region @buf.
>> + *
>> + * The function will be blocked until read size is
>> + * equal to requested size.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 1 if all bytes were read, 0 if end-of-file
>> + *          occurs without data, or -1 on error
>> + */
>> +int qio_channel_read_peek_all(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> +                              void* buf,
>> +                              size_t nbytes,
>> +                              Error **errp);
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * qio_channel_set_blocking:
>>    * @ioc: the channel object
>> diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c
>> index b76dca9cc1..b99f5dfda6 100644
>> --- a/io/channel-socket.c
>> +++ b/io/channel-socket.c
>> @@ -705,6 +705,32 @@ static ssize_t qio_channel_socket_writev(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>   }
>>   #endif /* WIN32 */
>>   
>> +static ssize_t qio_channel_socket_read_peek(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> +                                            void *buf,
>> +                                            size_t nbytes,
>> +                                            Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    QIOChannelSocket *sioc = QIO_CHANNEL_SOCKET(ioc);
>> +    ssize_t bytes = 0;
>> +
>> +retry:
>> +    bytes = recv(sioc->fd, buf, nbytes, MSG_PEEK);
>> +
>> +    if (bytes < 0) {
>> +        if (errno == EINTR) {
>> +            goto retry;
>> +        }
>> +        if (errno == EAGAIN) {
>> +            return QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
>> +                         "Unable to read from peek of socket");
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return bytes;
>> +}
>>   
>>   #ifdef QEMU_MSG_ZEROCOPY
>>   static int qio_channel_socket_flush(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> @@ -902,6 +928,7 @@ static void qio_channel_socket_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
>>   
>>       ioc_klass->io_writev = qio_channel_socket_writev;
>>       ioc_klass->io_readv = qio_channel_socket_readv;
>> +    ioc_klass->io_read_peek = qio_channel_socket_read_peek;
>>       ioc_klass->io_set_blocking = qio_channel_socket_set_blocking;
>>       ioc_klass->io_close = qio_channel_socket_close;
>>       ioc_klass->io_shutdown = qio_channel_socket_shutdown;
>> diff --git a/io/channel.c b/io/channel.c
>> index 0640941ac5..a2d9b96f3f 100644
>> --- a/io/channel.c
>> +++ b/io/channel.c
>> @@ -346,6 +346,45 @@ int qio_channel_write_all(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>       return qio_channel_writev_all(ioc, &iov, 1, errp);
>>   }
>>   
>> +int qio_channel_read_peek_all(QIOChannel *ioc,
>> +                              void* buf,
>> +                              size_t nbytes,
>> +                              Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +   QIOChannelClass *klass = QIO_CHANNEL_GET_CLASS(ioc);
>> +   ssize_t bytes = 0;
>> +
>> +   if (!klass->io_read_peek) {
>> +       error_setg(errp, "Channel does not support read peek");
>> +       return -1;
>> +   }
>> +
>> +   while (bytes < nbytes) {
>> +       bytes = klass->io_read_peek(ioc,
>> +                                   buf,
>> +                                   nbytes,
>> +                                   errp);
> IIUC here you need to accumulate bytes rather than directly reusing it, so
> e.g. two reads on 2 bytes each will satisfy a 4 bytes read.

Actually peek always reads from top so even if there are multile reads it does not accumulate.


>> +
>> +       if (bytes == QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK) {
>> +            if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
>> +                qio_channel_yield(ioc, G_IO_OUT);
> G_IO_IN?  Same question for two lines after.


Yes sorry, I will update it.


>
>> +            } else {
>> +                qio_channel_wait(ioc, G_IO_OUT);
>> +            }
>> +            continue;
>> +       }
>> +       if (bytes == 0) {
>> +           error_setg(errp,
>> +                      "Unexpected end-of-file on channel");
> IIUC for a generic API we should still allow the peek to get a close event
> on the socket.  Then we can return 0 safely and let the caller decide,
> rather than always assuming it's a fault.


sure Peter, I will update it.


>
>> +           return 0;
>> +       }
>> +       if (bytes < 0) {
>> +           return -1;
>> +       }
>> +   }
>> +
>> +   return 1;
>> +}
>>   
>>   int qio_channel_set_blocking(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>                                 bool enabled,
>> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
>> index 739bb683f3..406a9e2f72 100644
>> --- a/migration/migration.c
>> +++ b/migration/migration.c
>> @@ -733,31 +733,51 @@ void migration_ioc_process_incoming(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp)
>>   {
>>       MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
>>       Error *local_err = NULL;
>> -    bool start_migration;
>>       QEMUFile *f;
>> +    bool default_channel = true;
>> +    uint32_t channel_magic = 0;
>> +    int ret = 0;
>>   
>> -    if (!mis->from_src_file) {
>> -        /* The first connection (multifd may have multiple) */
>> +    if (migrate_use_multifd() && !migration_in_postcopy() &&
> It's weird to check postcopy status here.  Do you perhaps want to use
> migrate_postcopy_ram() or migrate_postcopy_preempt()?
>
> Note that I am tempted to disable multifd with postcopy in general before a
> full support is implemented, I'm not the only one who thinks so..  But
> that'll need to be discussed elsewhere, and yeah it's always safe now to
> check with either above (not migration_in_postcopy, though).


Yes, sorry, I did not use migrate_postcopy_preempt because it does not work with postcopy recover too. But agree this should be migrate_postcopy_ram.


>> +        !migrate_use_tls()) {
> I'd rather don't check TLS explicitly.  Can we perhaps try to detect the
> peek capability and then fallback to old method if peek() is not supported
> on the channel?  Below comment would still be nice to have though, and I
> also agree TLS seems to be safe.
>
> Thanks,


Sure will update it.


>> +        /*
>> +         * With multiple channels, it is possible that we receive channels
>> +         * out of order on destination side, causing incorrect mapping of
>> +         * source channels on destination side. Check channel MAGIC to
>> +         * decide type of channel. Please note this is best effort, postcopy
>> +         * preempt channel does not send any magic number so avoid it for
>> +         * postcopy live migration. Also tls live migration already does
>> +         * tls handshake while initializing main channel so with tls this
>> +         * issue is not possible.
>> +         */
>> +        ret = qio_channel_read_peek_all(ioc, (void *)&channel_magic,
>> +                                        sizeof(channel_magic), &local_err);
>> +
>> +        if (ret != 1) {
>> +            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        default_channel = (channel_magic == cpu_to_be32(QEMU_VM_FILE_MAGIC));
>> +    } else {
>> +        default_channel = !mis->from_src_file;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (default_channel) {
>>           f = qemu_file_new_input(ioc);
>>   
>>           if (!migration_incoming_setup(f, errp)) {
>>               return;
>>           }
>> -
>> -        /*
>> -         * Common migration only needs one channel, so we can start
>> -         * right now.  Some features need more than one channel, we wait.
>> -         */
>> -        start_migration = !migration_needs_multiple_sockets();
>>       } else {
>>           /* Multiple connections */
>>           assert(migration_needs_multiple_sockets());
>>           if (migrate_use_multifd()) {
>> -            start_migration = multifd_recv_new_channel(ioc, &local_err);
>> +            multifd_recv_new_channel(ioc, &local_err);
>>           } else {
>>               assert(migrate_postcopy_preempt());
>>               f = qemu_file_new_input(ioc);
>> -            start_migration = postcopy_preempt_new_channel(mis, f);
>> +            postcopy_preempt_new_channel(mis, f);
>>           }
>>           if (local_err) {
>>               error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> @@ -765,7 +785,7 @@ void migration_ioc_process_incoming(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp)
>>           }
>>       }
>>   
>> -    if (start_migration) {
>> +    if (migration_has_all_channels()) {
>>           /* If it's a recovery, we're done */
>>           if (postcopy_try_recover()) {
>>               return;
>> diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
>> index 586ddc9d65..be86a4d07f 100644
>> --- a/migration/multifd.c
>> +++ b/migration/multifd.c
>> @@ -1220,11 +1220,9 @@ bool multifd_recv_all_channels_created(void)
>>   
>>   /*
>>    * Try to receive all multifd channels to get ready for the migration.
>> - * - Return true and do not set @errp when correctly receiving all channels;
>> - * - Return false and do not set @errp when correctly receiving the current one;
>> - * - Return false and set @errp when failing to receive the current channel.
>> + * Sets @errp when failing to receive the current channel.
>>    */
>> -bool multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp)
>> +void multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp)
>>   {
>>       MultiFDRecvParams *p;
>>       Error *local_err = NULL;
>> @@ -1237,7 +1235,7 @@ bool multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp)
>>                                   "failed to receive packet"
>>                                   " via multifd channel %d: ",
>>                                   qatomic_read(&multifd_recv_state->count));
>> -        return false;
>> +        return;
>>       }
>>       trace_multifd_recv_new_channel(id);
>>   
>> @@ -1247,7 +1245,7 @@ bool multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp)
>>                      id);
>>           multifd_recv_terminate_threads(local_err);
>>           error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> -        return false;
>> +        return;
>>       }
>>       p->c = ioc;
>>       object_ref(OBJECT(ioc));
>> @@ -1258,6 +1256,4 @@ bool multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp)
>>       qemu_thread_create(&p->thread, p->name, multifd_recv_thread, p,
>>                          QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE);
>>       qatomic_inc(&multifd_recv_state->count);
>> -    return qatomic_read(&multifd_recv_state->count) ==
>> -           migrate_multifd_channels();
>>   }
>> diff --git a/migration/multifd.h b/migration/multifd.h
>> index 519f498643..913e4ba274 100644
>> --- a/migration/multifd.h
>> +++ b/migration/multifd.h
>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void multifd_save_cleanup(void);
>>   int multifd_load_setup(Error **errp);
>>   int multifd_load_cleanup(Error **errp);
>>   bool multifd_recv_all_channels_created(void);
>> -bool multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp);
>> +void multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp);
>>   void multifd_recv_sync_main(void);
>>   int multifd_send_sync_main(QEMUFile *f);
>>   int multifd_queue_page(QEMUFile *f, RAMBlock *block, ram_addr_t offset);
>> diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
>> index b9a37ef255..f84f783ab4 100644
>> --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
>> +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
>> @@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ void postcopy_unregister_shared_ufd(struct PostCopyFD *pcfd)
>>       }
>>   }
>>   
>> -bool postcopy_preempt_new_channel(MigrationIncomingState *mis, QEMUFile *file)
>> +void postcopy_preempt_new_channel(MigrationIncomingState *mis, QEMUFile *file)
>>   {
>>       /*
>>        * The new loading channel has its own threads, so it needs to be
>> @@ -1548,9 +1548,6 @@ bool postcopy_preempt_new_channel(MigrationIncomingState *mis, QEMUFile *file)
>>       qemu_file_set_blocking(file, true);
>>       mis->postcopy_qemufile_dst = file;
>>       trace_postcopy_preempt_new_channel();
>> -
>> -    /* Start the migration immediately */
>> -    return true;
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.h b/migration/postcopy-ram.h
>> index 6147bf7d1d..25881c4127 100644
>> --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.h
>> +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.h
>> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ enum PostcopyChannels {
>>       RAM_CHANNEL_MAX,
>>   };
>>   
>> -bool postcopy_preempt_new_channel(MigrationIncomingState *mis, QEMUFile *file);
>> +void postcopy_preempt_new_channel(MigrationIncomingState *mis, QEMUFile *file);
>>   int postcopy_preempt_setup(MigrationState *s, Error **errp);
>>   int postcopy_preempt_wait_channel(MigrationState *s);
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.22.3
>>

Thank you Peter for review. I see this patch is included by Juan too in some other patch series of 30 patches, so how it will work. Do i need to send a independent V3 for this? Or it should be reviewed in that series.


Thanks

Manish Mishra



  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-07 16:51 [PATCH v2] migration: check magic value for deciding the mapping of channels manish.mishra
2022-11-08 11:15 ` manish.mishra
2022-11-10 12:29 ` manish.mishra
2022-11-10 22:47   ` Peter Xu
2022-11-11  7:31     ` manish.mishra
2022-11-15 17:36 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-15 17:59   ` manish.mishra [this message]
2022-11-15 20:06     ` Peter Xu
2022-11-15 18:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-11-15 18:50   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-11-16 11:19     ` manish.mishra
2022-11-16 11:27       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-11-16 11:40         ` manish.mishra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a027006d-48f7-4d8d-465a-a726bbdc6fbf@nutanix.com \
    --to=manish.mishra@nutanix.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=prerna.saxena@nutanix.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).