From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDMu-0002wt-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 05:12:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDMp-0003hb-M4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 05:12:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZDMp-0003gz-HC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 05:12:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB1E8008D for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:12:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Laurent Vivier References: <20180105215246.908-1-quintela@redhat.com> <20180105215246.908-3-quintela@redhat.com> <20180110062545.GB5984@xz-mi> <87incayua8.fsf@secure.laptop> <82a94975-e040-298d-7d10-7448a4a0af48@redhat.com> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:12:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <82a94975-e040-298d-7d10-7448a4a0af48@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/11] tests: Migration ppc test was missing arguments List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: quintela@redhat.com, Peter Xu Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com On 10/01/2018 10:21, Laurent Vivier wrote: > On 10/01/2018 09:47, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Peter Xu wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:52:37PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >>>> Argument file is also needed there. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu >>> >>> Does it also mean this? >>> >>> Fixes: aaf89c8a49a8c ("test: port postcopy test to ppc64") >> >> Dunno. I was trying to consolidate the command line options for ppc and >> x86 when I found this problem. I haven't tested of ppc. > > I don't think it is needed. I think the content of the nvram is migrated > (otherwise the test wouldn't work at all). > > The nvram is created by default, we need the command line parameter only > to populate it from a file. A better change would be to use "-prom-env" instead of "-driver if=pflash". I can send the patch if you want to add it in your series. Thanks, Laurent