qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Tim Smith <tim.smith@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Avoid repeated memory allocation in xen_disk
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 11:15:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a04865aa2fb94f51b526d12cd07819e2@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154115286959.11300.498371710893672725.stgit@dhcp-3-135.uk.xensource.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Smith [mailto:tim.smith@citrix.com]
> Sent: 02 November 2018 10:01
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-
> block@nongnu.org
> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; Kevin Wolf
> <kwolf@redhat.com>; Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; Stefano
> Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>; Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Avoid repeated memory allocation in xen_disk
> 
> xen_disk currently allocates memory to hold the data for each ioreq
> as that ioreq is used, and frees it afterwards. Because it requires
> page-aligned blocks, this interacts poorly with non-page-aligned
> allocations and balloons the heap.
> 
> Instead, allocate the maximum possible requirement, which is
> BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST pages (currently 11 pages) when
> the ioreq is created, and keep that allocation until it is destroyed.
> Since the ioreqs themselves are re-used via a free list, this
> should actually improve memory usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tim.smith@citrix.com>

Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>

> ---
>  hw/block/xen_disk.c |   11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/xen_disk.c b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> index b506e23868..faaeefba29 100644
> --- a/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ static void ioreq_reset(struct ioreq *ioreq)
>      memset(&ioreq->req, 0, sizeof(ioreq->req));
>      ioreq->status = 0;
>      ioreq->start = 0;
> -    ioreq->buf = NULL;
>      ioreq->size = 0;
>      ioreq->presync = 0;
> 
> @@ -137,6 +136,11 @@ static struct ioreq *ioreq_start(struct XenBlkDev
> *blkdev)
>          /* allocate new struct */
>          ioreq = g_malloc0(sizeof(*ioreq));
>          ioreq->blkdev = blkdev;
> +        /* We cannot need more pages per ioreq than this, and we do re-
> use
> +         * ioreqs, so allocate the memory once here, to be freed in
> +         * blk_free() when the ioreq is freed. */
> +        ioreq->buf = qemu_memalign(XC_PAGE_SIZE,
> BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST
> +                                   * XC_PAGE_SIZE);
>          blkdev->requests_total++;
>          qemu_iovec_init(&ioreq->v, 1);
>      } else {
> @@ -313,14 +317,12 @@ static void qemu_aio_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>          if (ret == 0) {
>              ioreq_grant_copy(ioreq);
>          }
> -        qemu_vfree(ioreq->buf);
>          break;
>      case BLKIF_OP_WRITE:
>      case BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE:
>          if (!ioreq->req.nr_segments) {
>              break;
>          }
> -        qemu_vfree(ioreq->buf);
>          break;
>      default:
>          break;
> @@ -392,12 +394,10 @@ static int ioreq_runio_qemu_aio(struct ioreq *ioreq)
>  {
>      struct XenBlkDev *blkdev = ioreq->blkdev;
> 
> -    ioreq->buf = qemu_memalign(XC_PAGE_SIZE, ioreq->size);
>      if (ioreq->req.nr_segments &&
>          (ioreq->req.operation == BLKIF_OP_WRITE ||
>           ioreq->req.operation == BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE) &&
>          ioreq_grant_copy(ioreq)) {
> -        qemu_vfree(ioreq->buf);
>          goto err;
>      }
> 
> @@ -990,6 +990,7 @@ static int blk_free(struct XenDevice *xendev)
>          ioreq = QLIST_FIRST(&blkdev->freelist);
>          QLIST_REMOVE(ioreq, list);
>          qemu_iovec_destroy(&ioreq->v);
> +        qemu_vfree(ioreq->buf);
>          g_free(ioreq);
>      }
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-02 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-02 10:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Performance improvements for xen_disk v2 Tim Smith
2018-11-02 10:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Improve xen_disk batching behaviour Tim Smith
2018-11-02 11:14   ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-02 13:53   ` Anthony PERARD
2018-11-02 10:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Improve xen_disk response latency Tim Smith
2018-11-02 11:14   ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-02 13:53   ` Anthony PERARD
2018-11-02 10:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Avoid repeated memory allocation in xen_disk Tim Smith
2018-11-02 11:15   ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2018-11-02 13:53   ` Anthony PERARD
2018-11-02 11:04 ` [Qemu-devel] xen_disk qdevification (was: [PATCH 0/3] Performance improvements for xen_disk v2) Kevin Wolf
2018-11-02 11:13   ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-02 12:14     ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-05 15:57     ` [Qemu-devel] xen_disk qdevification Markus Armbruster
2018-11-05 16:15       ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-08 14:00       ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-08 15:21         ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-08 15:43           ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-08 16:44             ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-09 10:27               ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-09 10:40                 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-12-12  8:59   ` [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] xen_disk qdevification (was: [PATCH 0/3] Performance improvements for xen_disk v2) Olaf Hering
2018-12-12  9:22     ` Paul Durrant
2018-12-12 12:03     ` Kevin Wolf
2018-12-12 12:04     ` [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] xen_disk qdevification Markus Armbruster
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-02  9:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Performance improvements for xen_disk Tim Smith
2018-11-02  9:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Avoid repeated memory allocation in xen_disk Tim Smith
2018-09-07 10:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Improve xen_disk batching behaviour Tim Smith
2018-09-07 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Avoid repeated memory allocation in xen_disk Tim Smith
2018-09-07 16:05   ` Paul Durrant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a04865aa2fb94f51b526d12cd07819e2@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
    --to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.smith@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).