qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian <hibriansong@gmail.com>
To: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/21] fuse: Implement multi-threading
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 21:08:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0842801-ac45-4708-9253-8ec600e9c4aa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250604132813.359438-19-hreitz@redhat.com>



On 6/4/25 9:28 AM, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> FUSE allows creating multiple request queues by "cloning" /dev/fuse FDs
> (via open("/dev/fuse") + ioctl(FUSE_DEV_IOC_CLONE)).
> 
> We can use this to implement multi-threading.
> 
> For configuration, we don't need any more information beyond the simple
> array provided by the core block export interface: The FUSE kernel
> driver feeds these FDs in a round-robin fashion, so all of them are
> equivalent and we want to have exactly one per thread.
> 
> These are the benchmark results when using four threads (compared to a
> single thread); note that fio still only uses a single job, but
> performance can still be improved because of said round-robin usage for
> the queues.  (Not in the sync case, though, in which case I guess it
> just adds overhead.)
> 
> file:
>    read:
>      seq aio:   264.8k ±0.8k (+120 %)
>      rand aio:  143.8k ±0.4k (+ 27 %)
>      seq sync:   49.9k ±0.5k (-  5 %)
>      rand sync:  10.3k ±0.1k (-  1 %)
>    write:
>      seq aio:   226.6k ±2.1k (+184 %)
>      rand aio:  225.9k ±1.8k (+186 %)
>      seq sync:   36.9k ±0.6k (- 11 %)
>      rand sync:  36.9k ±0.2k (- 11 %)
> null:
>    read:
>      seq aio:   315.2k ±11.0k (+18 %)
>      rand aio:  300.5k ±10.8k (+14 %)
>      seq sync:  114.2k ± 3.6k (-16 %)
>      rand sync: 112.5k ± 2.8k (-16 %)
>    write:
>      seq aio:   222.6k ±6.8k (-21 %)
>      rand aio:  220.5k ±6.8k (-23 %)
>      seq sync:  117.2k ±3.7k (-18 %)
>      rand sync: 116.3k ±4.4k (-18 %)
> 
> (I don't know what's going on in the null-write AIO case, sorry.)
> 
> Here's results for numjobs=4:
> 
> "Before", i.e. without multithreading in QSD/FUSE (results compared to
> numjobs=1):
> 
> file:
>    read:
>      seq aio:   104.7k ± 0.4k (- 13 %)
>      rand aio:  111.5k ± 0.4k (-  2 %)
>      seq sync:   71.0k ±13.8k (+ 36 %)
>      rand sync:  41.4k ± 0.1k (+297 %)
>    write:
>      seq aio:    79.4k ±0.1k (-  1 %)
>      rand aio:   78.6k ±0.1k (±  0 %)
>      seq sync:   83.3k ±0.1k (+101 %)
>      rand sync:  82.0k ±0.2k (+ 98 %)
> null:
>    read:
>      seq aio:   260.5k ±1.5k (-  2 %)
>      rand aio:  260.1k ±1.4k (-  2 %)
>      seq sync:  291.8k ±1.3k (+115 %)
>      rand sync: 280.1k ±1.7k (+115 %)
>    write:
>      seq aio:   280.1k ±1.7k (±  0 %)
>      rand aio:  279.5k ±1.4k (-  3 %)
>      seq sync:  306.7k ±2.2k (+116 %)
>      rand sync: 305.9k ±1.8k (+117 %)
> 
> (As probably expected, little difference in the AIO case, but great
> improvements in the sync case because it kind of gives it an artificial
> iodepth of 4.)
> 
> "After", i.e. with four threads in QSD/FUSE (now results compared to the
> above):
> 
> file:
>    read:
>      seq aio:   193.3k ± 1.8k (+ 85 %)
>      rand aio:  329.3k ± 0.3k (+195 %)
>      seq sync:   66.2k ±13.0k (-  7 %)
>      rand sync:  40.1k ± 0.0k (-  3 %)
>    write:
>      seq aio:   219.7k ±0.8k (+177 %)
>      rand aio:  217.2k ±1.5k (+176 %)
>      seq sync:   92.5k ±0.2k (+ 11 %)
>      rand sync:  91.9k ±0.2k (+ 12 %)
> null:
>    read:
>      seq aio:   706.7k ±2.1k (+171 %)
>      rand aio:  714.7k ±3.2k (+175 %)
>      seq sync:  431.7k ±3.0k (+ 48 %)
>      rand sync: 435.4k ±2.8k (+ 50 %)
>    write:
>      seq aio:   746.9k ±2.8k (+167 %)
>      rand aio:  749.0k ±4.9k (+168 %)
>      seq sync:  420.7k ±3.1k (+ 37 %)
>      rand sync: 419.1k ±2.5k (+ 37 %)
> 
> So this helps mainly for the AIO cases, but also in the null sync cases,
> because null is always CPU-bound, so more threads help.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
> ---
>   block/export/fuse.c | 205 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 159 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/export/fuse.c b/block/export/fuse.c
> index 44f0b796b3..cdec31f2a8 100644
> --- a/block/export/fuse.c
> +++ b/block/export/fuse.c
> @@ -31,11 +31,14 @@
>   #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>   #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
>   #include "system/block-backend.h"
> +#include "system/block-backend.h"
> +#include "system/iothread.h"
>   
>   #include <fuse.h>
>   #include <fuse_lowlevel.h>
>   
>   #include "standard-headers/linux/fuse.h"
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
>   
>   #if defined(CONFIG_FALLOCATE_ZERO_RANGE)
>   #include <linux/falloc.h>
> @@ -50,12 +53,17 @@
>   /* Small enough to fit in the request buffer */
>   #define FUSE_MAX_WRITE_BYTES (4 * 1024)
>   
> -typedef struct FuseExport {
> -    BlockExport common;
> +typedef struct FuseExport FuseExport;
>   
> -    struct fuse_session *fuse_session;
> -    unsigned int in_flight; /* atomic */
> -    bool mounted, fd_handler_set_up;
> +/*
> + * One FUSE "queue", representing one FUSE FD from which requests are fetched
> + * and processed.  Each queue is tied to an AioContext.
> + */
> +typedef struct FuseQueue {
> +    FuseExport *exp;
> +
> +    AioContext *ctx;
> +    int fuse_fd;
>   
>       /*
>        * The request buffer must be able to hold a full write, and/or at least
> @@ -66,6 +74,14 @@ typedef struct FuseExport {
>                FUSE_MAX_WRITE_BYTES,
>           FUSE_MIN_READ_BUFFER
>       )];
> +} FuseQueue;
> +
> +struct FuseExport {
> +    BlockExport common;
> +
> +    struct fuse_session *fuse_session;
> +    unsigned int in_flight; /* atomic */
> +    bool mounted, fd_handler_set_up;
>   
>       /*
>        * Set when there was an unrecoverable error and no requests should be read
> @@ -74,7 +90,15 @@ typedef struct FuseExport {
>        */
>       bool halted;
>   
> -    int fuse_fd;
> +    int num_queues;
> +    FuseQueue *queues;
> +    /*
> +     * True if this export should follow the generic export's AioContext.
> +     * Will be false if the queues' AioContexts have been explicitly set by the
> +     * user, i.e. are expected to stay in those contexts.
> +     * (I.e. is always false if there is more than one queue.)
> +     */
> +    bool follow_aio_context;
>   
>       char *mountpoint;
>       bool writable;
> @@ -85,11 +109,11 @@ typedef struct FuseExport {
>       mode_t st_mode;
>       uid_t st_uid;
>       gid_t st_gid;
> -} FuseExport;
> +};
>   
>   /* Parameters to the request processing coroutine */
>   typedef struct FuseRequestCoParam {
> -    FuseExport *exp;
> +    FuseQueue *q;
>       int got_request;
>   } FuseRequestCoParam;
>   
> @@ -102,11 +126,12 @@ static void fuse_export_halt(FuseExport *exp);
>   static void init_exports_table(void);
>   
>   static int mount_fuse_export(FuseExport *exp, Error **errp);
> +static int clone_fuse_fd(int fd, Error **errp);
>   
>   static bool is_regular_file(const char *path, Error **errp);
>   
>   static void read_from_fuse_fd(void *opaque);
> -static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp);
> +static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseQueue *q);
>   
>   static void fuse_inc_in_flight(FuseExport *exp)
>   {
> @@ -136,8 +161,11 @@ static void fuse_attach_handlers(FuseExport *exp)
>           return;
>       }
>   
> -    aio_set_fd_handler(exp->common.ctx, exp->fuse_fd,
> -                       read_from_fuse_fd, NULL, NULL, NULL, exp);
> +    for (int i = 0; i < exp->num_queues; i++) {
> +        aio_set_fd_handler(exp->queues[i].ctx, exp->queues[i].fuse_fd,
> +                           read_from_fuse_fd, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> +                           &exp->queues[i]);
> +    }
>       exp->fd_handler_set_up = true;
>   }
>   
> @@ -146,8 +174,10 @@ static void fuse_attach_handlers(FuseExport *exp)
>    */
>   static void fuse_detach_handlers(FuseExport *exp)
>   {
> -    aio_set_fd_handler(exp->common.ctx, exp->fuse_fd,
> -                       NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +    for (int i = 0; i < exp->num_queues; i++) {
> +        aio_set_fd_handler(exp->queues[i].ctx, exp->queues[i].fuse_fd,
> +                           NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +    }
>       exp->fd_handler_set_up = false;
>   }
>   
> @@ -162,6 +192,11 @@ static void fuse_export_drained_end(void *opaque)
>   
>       /* Refresh AioContext in case it changed */
>       exp->common.ctx = blk_get_aio_context(exp->common.blk);
> +    if (exp->follow_aio_context) {
> +        assert(exp->num_queues == 1);
> +        exp->queues[0].ctx = exp->common.ctx;
> +    }
> +
>       fuse_attach_handlers(exp);
>   }
>   
> @@ -192,8 +227,32 @@ static int fuse_export_create(BlockExport *blk_exp,
>       assert(blk_exp_args->type == BLOCK_EXPORT_TYPE_FUSE);
>   
>       if (multithread) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "FUSE export does not support multi-threading");
> -        return -EINVAL;
> +        /* Guaranteed by common export code */
> +        assert(mt_count >= 1);
> +
> +        exp->follow_aio_context = false;
> +        exp->num_queues = mt_count;
> +        exp->queues = g_new(FuseQueue, mt_count);
> +
> +        for (size_t i = 0; i < mt_count; i++) {
> +            exp->queues[i] = (FuseQueue) {
> +                .exp = exp,
> +                .ctx = multithread[i],
> +                .fuse_fd = -1,
> +            };
> +        }
> +    } else {
> +        /* Guaranteed by common export code */
> +        assert(mt_count == 0);
> +
> +        exp->follow_aio_context = true;
> +        exp->num_queues = 1;
> +        exp->queues = g_new(FuseQueue, 1);
> +        exp->queues[0] = (FuseQueue) {
> +            .exp = exp,
> +            .ctx = exp->common.ctx,
> +            .fuse_fd = -1,
> +        };
>       }
>   
>       /* For growable and writable exports, take the RESIZE permission */
> @@ -280,13 +339,23 @@ static int fuse_export_create(BlockExport *blk_exp,
>   
>       g_hash_table_insert(exports, g_strdup(exp->mountpoint), NULL);
>   
> -    exp->fuse_fd = fuse_session_fd(exp->fuse_session);
> -    ret = qemu_fcntl_addfl(exp->fuse_fd, O_NONBLOCK);
> +    assert(exp->num_queues >= 1);
> +    exp->queues[0].fuse_fd = fuse_session_fd(exp->fuse_session);
> +    ret = qemu_fcntl_addfl(exp->queues[0].fuse_fd, O_NONBLOCK);
>       if (ret < 0) {
>           error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Failed to make FUSE FD non-blocking");
>           goto fail;
>       }
>   
> +    for (int i = 1; i < exp->num_queues; i++) {
> +        int fd = clone_fuse_fd(exp->queues[0].fuse_fd, errp);
> +        if (fd < 0) {
> +            ret = fd;
> +            goto fail;
> +        }
> +        exp->queues[i].fuse_fd = fd;
> +    }
> +
>       fuse_attach_handlers(exp);
>       return 0;
>   
> @@ -359,9 +428,42 @@ static int mount_fuse_export(FuseExport *exp, Error **errp)
>       return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * Clone the given /dev/fuse file descriptor, yielding a second FD from which
> + * requests can be pulled for the associated filesystem.  Returns an FD on
> + * success, and -errno on error.
> + */
> +static int clone_fuse_fd(int fd, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    uint32_t src_fd = fd;
> +    int new_fd;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The name "/dev/fuse" is fixed, see libfuse's lib/fuse_loop_mt.c
> +     * (fuse_clone_chan()).
> +     */
> +    new_fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK);
> +    if (new_fd < 0) {
> +        ret = -errno;
> +        error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Failed to open /dev/fuse");
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    ret = ioctl(new_fd, FUSE_DEV_IOC_CLONE, &src_fd);
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        ret = -errno;
> +        error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Failed to clone FUSE FD");
> +        close(new_fd);
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    return new_fd;
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * Try to read a single request from the FUSE FD.
> - * Takes a FuseExport pointer in `opaque`.
> + * Takes a FuseQueue pointer in `opaque`.
>    *
>    * Assumes the export's in-flight counter has already been incremented.
>    *
> @@ -369,8 +471,9 @@ static int mount_fuse_export(FuseExport *exp, Error **errp)
>    */
>   static void coroutine_fn co_read_from_fuse_fd(void *opaque)
>   {
> -    FuseExport *exp = opaque;
> -    int fuse_fd = exp->fuse_fd;
> +    FuseQueue *q = opaque;
> +    int fuse_fd = q->fuse_fd;
> +    FuseExport *exp = q->exp;
>       ssize_t ret;
>       const struct fuse_in_header *in_hdr;
>   
> @@ -378,8 +481,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn co_read_from_fuse_fd(void *opaque)
>           goto no_request;
>       }
>   
> -    ret = RETRY_ON_EINTR(read(fuse_fd, exp->request_buf,
> -                              sizeof(exp->request_buf)));
> +    ret = RETRY_ON_EINTR(read(fuse_fd, q->request_buf, sizeof(q->request_buf)));
>       if (ret < 0 && errno == EAGAIN) {
>           /* No request available */
>           goto no_request;
> @@ -397,7 +499,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn co_read_from_fuse_fd(void *opaque)
>           goto no_request;
>       }
>   
> -    in_hdr = (const struct fuse_in_header *)exp->request_buf;
> +    in_hdr = (const struct fuse_in_header *)q->request_buf;
>       if (unlikely(ret != in_hdr->len)) {
>           error_report("Number of bytes read from FUSE device does not match "
>                        "request size, expected %" PRIu32 " bytes, read %zi "
> @@ -408,7 +510,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn co_read_from_fuse_fd(void *opaque)
>           goto no_request;
>       }
>   
> -    fuse_co_process_request(exp);
> +    fuse_co_process_request(q);
>   
>   no_request:
>       fuse_dec_in_flight(exp);
> @@ -417,16 +519,16 @@ no_request:
>   /**
>    * Try to read and process a single request from the FUSE FD.
>    * (To be used as a handler for when the FUSE FD becomes readable.)
> - * Takes a FuseExport pointer in `opaque`.
> + * Takes a FuseQueue pointer in `opaque`.
>    */
>   static void read_from_fuse_fd(void *opaque)
>   {
> -    FuseExport *exp = opaque;
> +    FuseQueue *q = opaque;
>       Coroutine *co;
>   
> -    co = qemu_coroutine_create(co_read_from_fuse_fd, exp);
> +    co = qemu_coroutine_create(co_read_from_fuse_fd, q);
>       /* Decremented by co_read_from_fuse_fd() */
> -    fuse_inc_in_flight(exp);
> +    fuse_inc_in_flight(q->exp);
>       qemu_coroutine_enter(co);
>   }
>   
> @@ -451,6 +553,16 @@ static void fuse_export_delete(BlockExport *blk_exp)
>   {
>       FuseExport *exp = container_of(blk_exp, FuseExport, common);
>   
> +    for (int i = 0; i < exp->num_queues; i++) {
> +        FuseQueue *q = &exp->queues[i];
> +
> +        /* Queue 0's FD belongs to the FUSE session */
> +        if (i > 0 && q->fuse_fd >= 0) {
> +            close(q->fuse_fd);
> +        }
> +    }
> +    g_free(exp->queues);
> +
>       if (exp->fuse_session) {
>           if (exp->mounted) {
>               fuse_session_unmount(exp->fuse_session);
> @@ -1108,23 +1220,23 @@ static int fuse_write_buf_response(int fd, uint32_t req_id,
>   /*
>    * For use in fuse_co_process_request():
>    * Returns a pointer to the parameter object for the given operation (inside of
> - * exp->request_buf, which is assumed to hold a fuse_in_header first).
> - * Verifies that the object is complete (exp->request_buf is large enough to
> + * q->request_buf, which is assumed to hold a fuse_in_header first).
> + * Verifies that the object is complete (q->request_buf is large enough to
>    * hold it in one piece, and the request length includes the whole object).
>    *
> - * Note that exp->request_buf may be overwritten after yielding, so the returned
> + * Note that q->request_buf may be overwritten after yielding, so the returned
>    * pointer must not be used across a function that may yield!
>    */
> -#define FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(op_name, export) \
> +#define FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(op_name, queue) \

Should `q` actually be `queue` (i.e. the second parameter)?

The original code works because the second parameter passed to this 
macro is called `q` in the caller function.

>       ({ \
>           const struct fuse_in_header *__in_hdr = \
> -            (const struct fuse_in_header *)(export)->request_buf; \
> +            (const struct fuse_in_header *)(q)->request_buf; \

The same issue here.

>           const struct fuse_##op_name##_in *__in = \
>               (const struct fuse_##op_name##_in *)(__in_hdr + 1); \
>           const size_t __param_len = sizeof(*__in_hdr) + sizeof(*__in); \
>           uint32_t __req_len; \
>           \
> -        QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof((export)->request_buf) < __param_len); \
> +        QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof((q)->request_buf) < __param_len); \
>           \
>           __req_len = __in_hdr->len; \
>           if (__req_len < __param_len) { \
> @@ -1161,11 +1273,12 @@ static int fuse_write_buf_response(int fd, uint32_t req_id,
>    * Process a FUSE request, incl. writing the response.
>    *
>    * Note that yielding in any request-processing function can overwrite the
> - * contents of exp->request_buf.  Anything that takes a buffer needs to take
> + * contents of q->request_buf.  Anything that takes a buffer needs to take
>    * care that the content is copied before yielding.
>    */
> -static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp)
> +static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseQueue *q)
>   {
> +    FuseExport *exp = q->exp;
>       uint32_t opcode;
>       uint64_t req_id;
>       /*
> @@ -1188,7 +1301,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp)
>       /* Limit scope to ensure pointer is no longer used after yielding */
>       {
>           const struct fuse_in_header *in_hdr =
> -            (const struct fuse_in_header *)exp->request_buf;
> +            (const struct fuse_in_header *)q->request_buf;
>   
>           opcode = in_hdr->opcode;
>           req_id = in_hdr->unique;
> @@ -1196,7 +1309,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp)
>   
>       switch (opcode) {
>       case FUSE_INIT: {
> -        const struct fuse_init_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(init, exp);
> +        const struct fuse_init_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(init, q);
>           ret = fuse_co_init(exp, FUSE_OUT_OP_STRUCT(init, out_buf),
>                              in->max_readahead, in->flags);
>           break;
> @@ -1219,23 +1332,23 @@ static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp)
>           break;
>   
>       case FUSE_SETATTR: {
> -        const struct fuse_setattr_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(setattr, exp);
> +        const struct fuse_setattr_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(setattr, q);
>           ret = fuse_co_setattr(exp, FUSE_OUT_OP_STRUCT(attr, out_buf),
>                                 in->valid, in->size, in->mode, in->uid, in->gid);
>           break;
>       }
>   
>       case FUSE_READ: {
> -        const struct fuse_read_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(read, exp);
> +        const struct fuse_read_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(read, q);
>           ret = fuse_co_read(exp, &out_data_buffer, in->offset, in->size);
>           break;
>       }
>   
>       case FUSE_WRITE: {
> -        const struct fuse_write_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(write, exp);
> +        const struct fuse_write_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(write, q);
>           uint32_t req_len;
>   
> -        req_len = ((const struct fuse_in_header *)exp->request_buf)->len;
> +        req_len = ((const struct fuse_in_header *)q->request_buf)->len;
>           if (unlikely(req_len < sizeof(struct fuse_in_header) + sizeof(*in) +
>                                  in->size)) {
>               warn_report("FUSE WRITE truncated; received %zu bytes of %" PRIu32,
> @@ -1264,7 +1377,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp)
>       }
>   
>       case FUSE_FALLOCATE: {
> -        const struct fuse_fallocate_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(fallocate, exp);
> +        const struct fuse_fallocate_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(fallocate, q);
>           ret = fuse_co_fallocate(exp, in->offset, in->length, in->mode);
>           break;
>       }
> @@ -1279,7 +1392,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp)
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_FUSE_LSEEK
>       case FUSE_LSEEK: {
> -        const struct fuse_lseek_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(lseek, exp);
> +        const struct fuse_lseek_in *in = FUSE_IN_OP_STRUCT(lseek, q);
>           ret = fuse_co_lseek(exp, FUSE_OUT_OP_STRUCT(lseek, out_buf),
>                               in->offset, in->whence);
>           break;
> @@ -1293,11 +1406,11 @@ static void coroutine_fn fuse_co_process_request(FuseExport *exp)
>       /* Ignore errors from fuse_write*(), nothing we can do anyway */
>       if (out_data_buffer) {
>           assert(ret >= 0);
> -        fuse_write_buf_response(exp->fuse_fd, req_id, out_hdr,
> +        fuse_write_buf_response(q->fuse_fd, req_id, out_hdr,
>                                   out_data_buffer, ret);
>           qemu_vfree(out_data_buffer);
>       } else {
> -        fuse_write_response(exp->fuse_fd, req_id, out_hdr,
> +        fuse_write_response(q->fuse_fd, req_id, out_hdr,
>                               ret < 0 ? ret : 0,
>                               ret < 0 ? 0 : ret);
>       }



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-27  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-04 13:27 [PATCH v2 00/21] export/fuse: Use coroutines and multi-threading Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] fuse: Copy write buffer content before polling Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-09 14:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-04 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] fuse: Ensure init clean-up even with error_fatal Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] fuse: Remove superfluous empty line Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] fuse: Explicitly set inode ID to 1 Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] fuse: Change setup_... to mount_fuse_export() Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] fuse: Fix mount options Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] fuse: Set direct_io and parallel_direct_writes Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] fuse: Introduce fuse_{at,de}tach_handlers() Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] fuse: Introduce fuse_{inc,dec}_in_flight() Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] fuse: Add halted flag Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] fuse: Rename length to blk_len in fuse_write() Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-09 14:48   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] block: Move qemu_fcntl_addfl() into osdep.c Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 15:18   ` Eric Blake
2025-06-09 15:03   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-07-01  7:24     ` Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] fuse: Manually process requests (without libfuse) Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-09 16:54   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] fuse: Reduce max read size Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] fuse: Process requests in coroutines Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-05  8:12   ` Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-09 16:57   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] block/export: Add multi-threading interface Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:58   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-06-09 17:00   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] iotests/307: Test multi-thread export interface Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] fuse: Implement multi-threading Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-09 18:10   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-27  1:08   ` Brian [this message]
2025-07-01  7:31     ` Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] qapi/block-export: Document FUSE's multi-threading Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-04 13:58   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] iotests/308: Add multi-threading sanity test Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-09 18:12   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] fuse: Increase MAX_WRITE_SIZE with a second buffer Hanna Czenczek
2025-06-10 23:37   ` Brian
2025-06-11 13:46     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-09 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] export/fuse: Use coroutines and multi-threading Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a0842801-ac45-4708-9253-8ec600e9c4aa@gmail.com \
    --to=hibriansong@gmail.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).