From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] qapi: remove all TARGET_* conditionals from the schema
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 16:56:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0b57e48-e826-4376-aa69-8db92c939064@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508135816.673087-1-berrange@redhat.com>
On 8/5/25 15:58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Pierrick has proposed a series that introduces a concept of runtime
> conditionals to the QAPI schema, in order to adapt the TARGET_*
> conditionals currently used at build time:
>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-05/msg01699.html
>
> For the sake of comparison & evaluation, this series illustrates the
> alternative approach that we've discussed of entirely removing any
> concept of TARGET_* conditionals.
>
> With this the QAPI schema varies solely based on CONFIG_* conditionals,
> and is thus invariant across different target emulators.
>
> In this PoC I've taken the minimal effort approach to the problem.
>
> The QAPI schema has removed the TARGET_* conditionals and in order to
> make all the emulators then compile, the stubs/ directory is populated
> with a bunch of files to provide dummy impls of the target specific QMP
> commands.
>
> This is sufficient to make the current QEMU binaries build successfully.
>
> To make the "single binary" concept work, however, would require
> additional followup work to eliminate the stubs.
>
> Instead of having stubs we would need to de-couple the QMP command
> impl from the machine internals. This would likely require greater
> use of interfaces and/or virtual method dispatchers on the machine
> class. This would enable the 'qmp_XXXXX' command impls to exist
> once. Then they call out to virtual methods on the machine to provide
> the real impl, and/or generate an error if the virtual method is not
> implemented for the machine.
Note, I don't see commands "per machine", but per device (including
CPU). When not specified, we iterate over device implementations / CPUs.
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé (9):
> qapi: expose rtc-reset-reinjection command unconditionally
> qapi: expand docs for SEV commands
> qapi: make SEV commands unconditionally available
> qapi: expose query-gic-capability command unconditionally
> qapi: make SGX commands unconditionally available
> qapi: make Xen event commands unconditionally available
> qapi: remove the misc-target.json file
> qapi: make most CPU commands unconditionally available
> qapi: make s390x specific CPU commands unconditionally available
>
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
> qapi: Make CpuModelExpansionInfo::deprecated-props optional and
> generic
>
> hw/i386/kvm/xen-stubs.c | 13 -
> hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c | 2 +-
> hw/i386/monitor.c | 2 +-
> hw/i386/sgx-stub.c | 13 -
> hw/i386/sgx.c | 2 +-
> hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 4 +-
> hw/s390x/s390-skeys.c | 1 -
> include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 2 +-
> qapi/machine-s390x.json | 120 ++++++
> qapi/machine-target.json | 523 --------------------------
> qapi/machine.json | 363 ++++++++++++++++++
> qapi/meson.build | 5 +-
> qapi/misc-arm.json | 49 +++
> qapi/misc-i386.json | 479 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> qapi/misc-target.json | 504 -------------------------
> qapi/qapi-schema.json | 5 +-
> stubs/meson.build | 8 +
> stubs/monitor-arm-gic.c | 12 +
> stubs/monitor-cpu-s390x-kvm.c | 22 ++
> stubs/monitor-cpu-s390x.c | 23 ++
> stubs/monitor-cpu.c | 21 ++
> stubs/monitor-i386-rtc.c | 10 +
> stubs/monitor-i386-sev.c | 36 ++
> stubs/monitor-i386-sgx.c | 17 +
> stubs/monitor-i386-xen.c | 16 +
> target/arm/arm-qmp-cmds.c | 4 +-
> target/i386/cpu-system.c | 2 +-
> target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
> target/i386/monitor.c | 1 -
> target/i386/sev-system-stub.c | 32 --
> target/i386/sev.c | 2 +-
> target/loongarch/loongarch-qmp-cmds.c | 2 +-
> target/mips/system/mips-qmp-cmds.c | 12 +-
> target/ppc/ppc-qmp-cmds.c | 12 +-
> target/riscv/riscv-qmp-cmds.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/cpu_models_system.c | 2 +-
> tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c | 1 +
Eh I did a very similar series last month which didn't pass local
review, I need to remember what was the issue...
$ git diff --stat eb3020b6ed2baca63..32235d621871df0ccc
MAINTAINERS | 3 ++
qapi/machine-arm-target.json | 47 +++++++++++++++++
qapi/machine-s390x-target.json | 301
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
qapi/machine-target.json | 295
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
qapi/{misc-target.json => machine-x86-target.json} | 94
++++++++++++++++++----------------
qapi/machine.json | 44 ----------------
qapi/qapi-schema.json | 4 +-
include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 2 +-
hw/i386/kvm/xen-stubs.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/monitor.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/sgx-stub.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/sgx.c | 2 +-
hw/s390x/s390-skeys.c | 1 -
target/arm/arm-qmp-cmds.c | 3 +-
target/i386/cpu-system.c | 1 +
target/i386/cpu.c | 3 ++
target/i386/monitor.c | 2 +-
target/i386/sev-system-stub.c | 2 +-
target/i386/sev.c | 2 +-
target/s390x/cpu_models_system.c | 3 +-
qapi/meson.build | 4 +-
22 files changed, 423 insertions(+), 398 deletions(-)
$ git log --oneline eb3020b6ed2baca63..32235d621871df0ccc | tac -r
c92b1454ef1 qapi: Restrict ARM specific schemas to ARM
9c708185fe4 qapi: Restrict CpuModelCompareResult to s390x target
c50cc3c438c qapi: Restrict s390x-specific schemas to s390x target
221ec7acf18 qapi: Restrict SGXEPCSection to x86 targets
a3606c5b23c qapi: Restrict x86-specific schemas to x86 targets
32235d62187 qapi: Guard x86 specific schemas with conditional
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 13:58 [PATCH RFC 00/10] qapi: remove all TARGET_* conditionals from the schema Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 01/10] qapi: expose rtc-reset-reinjection command unconditionally Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-10 9:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-12 18:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-13 0:54 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 1:09 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 7:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 02/10] qapi: expand docs for SEV commands Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-13 12:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 12:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 03/10] qapi: make SEV commands unconditionally available Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 04/10] qapi: expose query-gic-capability command unconditionally Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 05/10] qapi: make SGX commands unconditionally available Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 06/10] qapi: make Xen event " Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 15:01 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-05-08 17:48 ` David Woodhouse
2025-05-08 17:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 19:08 ` David Woodhouse
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] qapi: remove the misc-target.json file Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 08/10] qapi: Make CpuModelExpansionInfo::deprecated-props optional and generic Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-13 12:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 12:41 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 09/10] qapi: make most CPU commands unconditionally available Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 20:55 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 12:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 16:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/10] qapi: make s390x specific " Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 14:56 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2025-05-08 14:58 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] qapi: remove all TARGET_* conditionals from the schema Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 21:09 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-09 9:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-09 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-09 13:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-10 6:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-12 18:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-10 9:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-12 18:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-12 20:09 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 7:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 14:36 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 14:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0b57e48-e826-4376-aa69-8db92c939064@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).