From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>, "John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Kamil Rytarowski" <kamil@netbsd.org>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Python 2 and test/vm/netbsd
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 16:58:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0c2df74-360b-79de-132e-f4d5be5bfc12@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018142940.GN4084@habkost.net>
On 10/18/19 4:29 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:44:39PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>>> Running with V=1, I see packages being downloaded at reasonable speeds, but
>>>> there's a huge interval (of various minutes) between each package download.
>>>
>>> I've found the cause for the slowness I'm seeing: for each file
>>> being downloaded, the guest spents at least 75 seconds trying to
>>> connect to the IPv6 address of ftp.NetBSD.org, before trying
>>> IPv4.
>>
>> Ah, that nicely explains why it worked just fine for me. First, I have
>> a local proxy configured so the installer isn't going to connect to
>> ftp.NetBSD.org directly. Second I have IPv6 connectivity.
>>
>>> I don't know if this is a NetBSD bug, or a slirp bug.
>>
>> Both I'd say ...
>>
>> First, by default slirp should not send IPv6 router announcements
>> to the user network if the host has no IPv6 connectivity.
>>
>> Second, the recommended way to connect is to try ipv4 and ipv6 in
>> parallel, then use whatever connects first. Web browsers typically
>> do it that way. wget and curl don't do that though, they try one
>> address after the other, and I guess this is where the delay comes
>> from ...
>
> In addition to that, the connect() error should be generating a
> ICMP6_UNREACH message, and I'd expect the NetBSD guest to notice
> it instead of waiting for timeout.
Is this missing in SLiRP?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 3:00 Python 2 and test/vm/netbsd (was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] Python queue, 2019-06-07) Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-16 6:11 ` Python 2 and test/vm/netbsd Thomas Huth
2019-10-16 8:25 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2019-10-16 10:59 ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-16 11:02 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-16 12:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-16 22:41 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-17 22:05 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-17 22:55 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-18 7:13 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-18 14:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-18 10:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-10-18 14:29 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-18 14:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2019-10-18 16:00 ` Samuel Thibault
2019-10-18 16:41 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-22 13:16 ` Samuel Thibault
2019-10-22 13:05 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2019-10-22 13:10 ` Samuel Thibault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0c2df74-360b-79de-132e-f4d5be5bfc12@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kamil@netbsd.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).