From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35923) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buaOV-00062v-IF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:25:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buaOQ-0002jg-1I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:25:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buaOP-0002jU-Oy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:25:29 -0400 References: <1476193521-29034-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> <5359ead6-106d-31f3-f71b-681e926c32a3@redhat.com> From: Marcel Apfelbaum Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:25:07 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5359ead6-106d-31f3-f71b-681e926c32a3@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com, laine@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, abologna@redhat.com, "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com On 10/12/2016 06:28 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Marcel, > > On 10/11/16 15:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> Proposes best practices on how to use PCI Express/PCI device >> in PCI Express based machines and explain the reasoning behind them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum >> --- >> >> Hi, >> >> RFC->v2: >> - Addressed a lot of comments from the reviewers (many thanks to all, especially to Laszlo) >> >> Since the RFC mail-thread was relatively long and already >> has passed a lot of time from the RFC, I post this version >> even if is very possible that I left some of the comments out, >> my apologies if so. >> >> I will go over the comments again, in the meantime please >> feel free to comment on this version, even if on something >> you've already pointed out. >> >> It may take a day or two until I'll be able to respond, but I >> will do my best to address all comments. >> >> Thanks, >> Marcel >> >> >> docs/pcie.txt | 273 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 273 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 docs/pcie.txt > > Your patch doesn't seem to have reached qemu-devel. I got one copy from > you directly, and no copy reflected by the qemu-devel list server. I > also checked the mailing list archive: > - searched for the subject with google -- only the RFC version was found, > - checked mail-archive.com by message-id > - checked the primary archive for October > (http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/threads.html) > -- I found only messages in the RFC thread. > > So, before I start reading this version and commenting on it, can you > please repost version 2, and verify that the list reflects it? > Hi, That is very strange, I tried sending it again but I received the same error: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender ... : host eggs.gnu.org[208.118.235.92] said: 550 Invalid address in message header (in reply to end of DATA command) Reporting-MTA: dns; <>.redhat.com X-Postfix-Queue-ID: <> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; marcel@redhat.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Final-Recipient: rfc822; qemu-devel@nongnu.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;qemu-devel@nongnu.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; eggs.gnu.org Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid address in message header I'll try sending the mail with another mail server. Thanks, Marcel > Thanks! > Laszlo >