From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZyuC-0003ke-Q5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:21:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZyu8-0007xq-Ne for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:21:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZyu8-0007xh-Dd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:21:04 -0400 References: <1471149312-28148-1-git-send-email-ashish.mittal@veritas.com> <20160815102046.GC13261@redhat.com> <20160815104752.GE6024@noname.str.redhat.com> <20160815105457.GD13261@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:20:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160815105457.GD13261@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 RFC] block/vxhs: Initial commit to add Veritas HyperScale VxHS block device support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" , Kevin Wolf Cc: Ashish Mittal , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, ashish.mittal@veritas.com, stefanha@gmail.com, Ketan.Nilangekar@veritas.com, Abhijit.Dey@veritas.com On 15/08/2016 12:54, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I think the dot-separated qapi syntax is actually more user friendly as > looking at it, it is obvious what each component does. The URI syntax is > inherantly limited, so if you start with that syntax and then want to > support > 1 server, you have to completely change to the qapi syntax anyway. If I understand correctly, this already supports >1 data server, the URI is to some kind of metadata server that is used only at startup. Paolo