From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdJI7-0006ea-4u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:52:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdJI2-0004Dn-96 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:52:39 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x541.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::541]:34417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdJI2-0004Dg-1G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:52:34 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x541.google.com with SMTP id d3-v6so19846485edi.1 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:52:33 -0700 (PDT) References: <20180709091136.28849-1-e.emanuelegiuseppe@gmail.com> <20180709091136.28849-8-e.emanuelegiuseppe@gmail.com> <20180711151544.GQ31228@stefanha-x1.localdomain> From: Emanuele Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 19:52:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180711151544.GQ31228@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] tests/qgraph: sdhci test node List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Laurent Vivier , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 07/11/2018 05:15 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:11:36AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote: >> +/** >> + * Old sdhci_t structure: > Do you intend to delete this comment before this series is merged? It > seems like a TODO that doesn't need to be kept around. Paolo suggested me to put it there, because there still are some devices that need to be implemented. > >> + qos_add_test("sdhci-test", "sdhci", test_machine); > How does this work for tests that need access to more than 1 device? > Can they request a driver instance via the API? Uhm accessing more than one device is something I did not take into account. It is possible to add additional command line to the test, with qos_add_test_args(), but no multiple devices. I'll add it as TODO in my list, thanks