From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtvQ-00005h-CG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:21:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtvP-0002RM-LT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:21:32 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtvP-0002Qv-FT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:21:31 -0500 References: <874m0wqofz.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:21:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <874m0wqofz.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI HBA auto-created for -drive if=scsi List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell On 18/01/2017 18:15, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Some boards automatically cold-plug SCSI HBAs to honor -drive if=scsi. > Which one depends on the machine: > > pc*, realview-eb*, versatile*: lsi53c895a > spapr-machine: spapr-vscsi > > Should we use something less thoroughly obsolete than lsi53c895a for new > machine types? Something that actually has a maintainer? Or just raise an error?... Paolo