Re: [PATCH RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split out s390x sections

[Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>]

On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 11:23 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05 2022, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 11:55 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > Split out some more specialized devices etc., so that we can
> > > build
> > > smarter lists of people to be put on cc: in the future.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > > Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > > Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > 
> > (Late to the party, Happy New Year!) I like the rearrangement:
> 
> Happy new year :)
> 
> > Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Of course, you also said in v1:
> > 
> > """
> > - The new sections have inherited the maintainers of the sections
> >   they have been split out of (except where people had already
> >   volunteered). That's easy to change, obviously, and I hope that
> >   the cc: list already contains people who might have interest in
> >   volunteering for some sections.
> > """
> > 
> > As someone on cc, I could volunteer to help with these sections:
> > 
> > S390 Machines
> > -------------
> > S390 Virtio-ccw
> > S390 channel subsystem
> > 
> > Devices
> > -------
> > virtio-ccw
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Do you want to do a patch on top, or should I do a v3? (A separate
> patch
> is probably better.)

I can do a patch on top.

Eric

>