qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] s390x/mmu: DAT table definition overhaul
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:52:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a23494c5-be2e-448d-e96c-864c7841ec29@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dee25e68-43f2-f6b5-ce2f-f76112b33f5d@redhat.com>

On 26/09/2019 09.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.09.19 09:35, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 25/09/2019 14.52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Let's use consitent names for the region/section/page table entries and
>>> for the macros to extract relevant parts from virtual address. Make them
>>> match the definitions in the PoP - e.g., how the televant bits are actually
>>
>> s/televant/relevant/
>>
>>> called.
>>>
>>> Introduce defines for all bits declared in the PoP. This will come in
>>> handy in follow-up patches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  target/s390x/cpu.h        | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>  target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 12 +++---
>>>  target/s390x/mmu_helper.c | 37 ++++++++++---------
>>>  3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>> index 163dae13d7..e74a809257 100644
>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>> @@ -558,26 +558,63 @@ QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB) != 4096);
>>>  #define ASCE_TYPE_SEGMENT     0x00        /* segment table type               */
>>>  #define ASCE_TABLE_LENGTH     0x03        /* region table length              */
>>>  
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN   (~0xfffULL) /* region/segment table origin    */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_RO       0x200       /* region/segment protection bit  */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TF       0xc0        /* region/segment table offset    */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_INV      0x20        /* invalid region table entry     */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_MASK 0x0c       /* region/segment table type mask */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R1  0x0c        /* region first table type        */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R2  0x08        /* region second table type       */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R3  0x04        /* region third table type        */
>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_LENGTH   0x03        /* region third length            */
>>> -
>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_ORIGIN  (~0x7ffULL) /* segment table origin        */
>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_FC      0x400       /* format control              */
>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_RO      0x200       /* page protection bit         */
>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_INV     0x20        /* invalid segment table entry */
>>> -
>>> -#define VADDR_PX              0xff000     /* page index bits   */
>>> -
>>> -#define PAGE_RO               0x200       /* HW read-only bit  */
>>> -#define PAGE_INVALID          0x400       /* HW invalid bit    */
>>> -#define PAGE_RES0             0x800       /* bit must be zero  */
>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN         0xfffffffffffff000ULL
>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_P              0x0000000000000200ULL
>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_TF             0x00000000000000c0ULL
>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_I              0x0000000000000020ULL
>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_TT             0x000000000000000cULL
>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_TL             0x0000000000000003ULL
>>
>> Any chance that you could keep the comments after the definitions? I
>> think they are useful for people who are not 100% familiar with the DAT
>> on s390x.
> 
> I thought about that, but do we expect people that don't have a clue
> about s390x DAT and don't compare the code against the PoP to understand
> our DAT translation just by comments on defines?

I'm not sure that everybody is aware of the PoP ... maybe you could just
put a comment in front of the block a la:

/*
 * For details on the following definitions, see the "Dynamic Address
 * Translation" section in chapter 3 of the "z/Architecture Principles
 * of Operations - SA22-7832-11"
 */

?

 Thomas


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-26  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-25 12:52 [PATCH v2 0/7] s390x/mmu: DAT translation rewrite David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] s390x/mmu: Drop debug logging from MMU code David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:28   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:11   ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] s390x/mmu: Move DAT protection handling out of mmu_translate_asce() David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:01   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:14   ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] s390x/mmu: Inject DAT exceptions from a single place David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:05   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:14   ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] s390x/mmu: Inject PGM_ADDRESSING on boguous table addresses David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:12   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:25   ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 19:36     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] s390x/mmu: Use TARGET_PAGE_MASK in mmu_translate_pte() David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:15   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:26   ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] s390x/mmu: DAT table definition overhaul David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26  7:35   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-26  7:38     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26  7:52       ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-09-26  7:59         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26  8:07           ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] s390x/mmu: Convert to non-recursive page table walk David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a23494c5-be2e-448d-e96c-864c7841ec29@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).