From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCkDX-0002r3-W7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:42:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCkDT-0006Nb-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:42:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCkDS-0006MQ-W9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 07:42:19 -0400 References: <20181017090750.4378-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <001f01d465fd$01af8b80$050ea280$@ru> <0817e2fe-5a97-a4ed-9ae2-2e8dee6c9a43@redhat.com> <004201d4660d$e86ef1e0$b94cd5a0$@ru> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:42:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <004201d4660d$e86ef1e0$b94cd5a0$@ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert "icount: remove obsolete warp call" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Dovgalyuk , 'Artem Pisarenko' , 'Clement Deschamps' Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, 'Pavel Dovgalyuk' On 17/10/2018 13:38, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com] >> On 17/10/2018 11:53, Artem Pisarenko wrote: >>> See my last comment in bug report. This kind of modification, even >>> adapted to changed function name, doesn't solve issue. >>> I thought long time that it does, but once I catched qemu with a hang. >>> And of course, I wasn't able to reproduce it. So it just better hides issue. >>> Take a look at alternative solution from >>> QBox: https://git.greensocs.com/qemu/qbox/commit/a8ed106032e375e715a531d6e93e4d9ec295dbdb >>> I didn't catched fail with it (yet). > > Tried to test it, but rr seems to be broken again. > I'll try to bisect now. Can we add a test that runs with "make check" and covers the basics of record/replay's cpus.c bits? rr is very cool, and we fixed/understood a lot of stuff when getting it ready for inclusion. But now it's constantly broken and every time we change rr we also risk breaking icount. Paolo