From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/net/net_tx_pkt: Fix virtio header without checksum offloading
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:04:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a31d0734-823b-4b67-8888-46f0c787cf8f@daynix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEvBoe4XQeHOR64rNwAPM-vBMsfLQApWpUoMtvwsSVCpUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024/03/26 15:51, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 4:32 PM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> wrote:
>>
>> It is incorrect to have the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM set when
>> checksum offloading is disabled so clear the bit. Set the
>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID bit instead to tell the checksum is valid.
>>
>> TCP/UDP checksum is usually offloaded when the peer requires virtio
>> headers because they can instruct the peer to compute checksum. However,
>> igb disables TX checksum offloading when a VF is enabled whether the
>> peer requires virtio headers because a transmitted packet can be routed
>> to it and it expects the packet has a proper checksum. Therefore, it
>> is necessary to have a correct virtio header even when checksum
>> offloading is disabled.
>>
>> A real TCP/UDP checksum will be computed and saved in the buffer when
>> checksum offloading is disabled. The virtio specification requires to
>> set the packet checksum stored in the buffer to the TCP/UDP pseudo
>> header when the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM bit is set so the bit must
>> be cleared in that case.
>>
>> The VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM bit also tells to skip checksum
>> validation. Even if checksum offloading is disabled, it is desirable to
>> skip checksum validation because the checksum is always correct. Use the
>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID bit to claim the validity of the checksum.
>>
>> Fixes: ffbd2dbd8e64 ("e1000e: Perform software segmentation for loopback")
>> Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-23067
>> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>> ---
>> hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c b/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c
>> index 2e5f58b3c9cc..c225cf706513 100644
>> --- a/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c
>> +++ b/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c
>> @@ -833,6 +833,9 @@ bool net_tx_pkt_send_custom(struct NetTxPkt *pkt, bool offload,
>>
>> if (offload || gso_type == VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE) {
>> if (!offload && pkt->virt_hdr.flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) {
>> + pkt->virt_hdr.flags =
>> + (pkt->virt_hdr.flags & ~VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) |
>> + VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID;
>
> Why VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID is used in TX path?
On igb, a packet sent from a PCI function may be routed to another
function. The virtio header updated here will be directly provided to
the RX path in such a case.
Regards,
Akihiko Odaki
>
> Thanks
>
>> net_tx_pkt_do_sw_csum(pkt, &pkt->vec[NET_TX_PKT_L2HDR_FRAG],
>> pkt->payload_frags + NET_TX_PKT_PL_START_FRAG - 1,
>> pkt->payload_len);
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: ba49d760eb04630e7b15f423ebecf6c871b8f77b
>> change-id: 20240324-tx-c57d3c22ad73
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-24 8:31 [PATCH] hw/net/net_tx_pkt: Fix virtio header without checksum offloading Akihiko Odaki
2024-03-26 6:51 ` Jason Wang
2024-03-26 7:04 ` Akihiko Odaki [this message]
2024-03-27 2:50 ` Jason Wang
2024-03-27 2:52 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-03-27 2:59 ` Jason Wang
2024-03-27 3:04 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-03-27 3:06 ` Jason Wang
2024-03-27 3:11 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-03-27 3:24 ` Jason Wang
2024-03-27 4:12 ` Akihiko Odaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a31d0734-823b-4b67-8888-46f0c787cf8f@daynix.com \
--to=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).