Re: [PATCH 3/3] target: Set `CF_PCREL` for arm and i386 frontends

[Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>]

On 2/7/23 00:43, Anton Johansson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anton Johansson <anjo@rev.ng>
> ---
>   target/arm/cpu-param.h  | 2 --
>   target/arm/cpu.c        | 5 +++++
>   target/i386/cpu-param.h | 4 ----
>   target/i386/cpu.c       | 5 +++++
>   4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu-param.h b/target/arm/cpu-param.h
> index 53cac9c89b..b7bde18986 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu-param.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu-param.h
> @@ -31,8 +31,6 @@
>   # define TARGET_PAGE_BITS_VARY
>   # define TARGET_PAGE_BITS_MIN  10
>   
> -# define TARGET_TB_PCREL 1
> -
>   /*
>    * Cache the attrs and shareability fields from the page table entry.
>    *
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index 31dc595e11..62b876e0f0 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,11 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>       Error *local_err = NULL;
>       bool no_aa32 = false;
>   
> +    /* Use pc-relative instructions in system-mode */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +    cs->tcg_cflags |= CF_PCREL;
> +#endif

To fix bisection problems, the hunks setting CF_PCREL need to precede removal of the 
TARGET_TB_PCREL tests.  The removal of TARGET_TB_PCREL can happen all at once at the end.


r~