[PATCH v2 0/2] target/s390x/kvm: Simplify the synchronization code

[PATCH v2 0/2] target/s390x/kvm: Simplify the synchronization code

[Thomas Huth]

KVM_SYNC_GPRS, KVM_SYNC_ACRS, KVM_SYNC_CRS and KVM_SYNC_PREFIX are
available since kernel 3.10. Since we already require at least kernel
3.15 in the s390x KVM code, we can also assume that the KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS
sync code is always possible for these registers, and remove the
related checks and fallbacks via KVM_SET_REGS and KVM_GET_REGS.

v2:
- Split the patch from v1 into two patches
- Use a #define KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS for the required sync bits
- Use memcpy() instead of for-loops for copying the registers

Thomas Huth (2):
  target/s390x/kvm: Turn KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS into a hard requirement
  target/s390x/kvm: Simplify the GPRs, ACRs, CRs and prefix
    synchronization code

 target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 120 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)

-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v2 1/2] target/s390x/kvm: Turn KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS into a hard requirement

[Thomas Huth]

Since we already require at least kernel 3.15 in the s390x KVM code,
we can assume that the KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS capability is always there.
Thus turn this into a hard requirement now.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index bc5c56a305..b3e2eaa2eb 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -337,21 +337,29 @@ int kvm_arch_get_default_type(MachineState *ms)
 
 int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
 {
+    int required_caps[] = {
+        KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL,
+        KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS,
+    };
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(required_caps); i++) {
+        if (!kvm_check_extension(s, required_caps[i])) {
+            error_report("KVM is missing capability #%d - "
+                         "please use kernel 3.15 or newer", required_caps[i]);
+            return -1;
+        }
+    }
+
     object_class_foreach(ccw_machine_class_foreach, TYPE_S390_CCW_MACHINE,
                          false, NULL);
 
-    if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL)) {
-        error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL - "
-                     "please use kernel 3.15 or newer");
-        return -1;
-    }
     if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
         error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_S390_COW - "
                      "unsupported environment");
         return -1;
     }
 
-    cap_sync_regs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS);
+    cap_sync_regs = true;
     cap_async_pf = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF);
     cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
     cap_mem_op_extension = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v2 2/2] target/s390x/kvm: Simplify the GPRs, ACRs, CRs and prefix synchronization code

[Thomas Huth]

KVM_SYNC_GPRS, KVM_SYNC_ACRS, KVM_SYNC_CRS and KVM_SYNC_PREFIX are
available since kernel 3.10. Since we already require at least kernel
3.15 in the s390x KVM code, we can also assume that the KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS
sync code is always possible for these registers, and remove the
related checks and fallbacks via KVM_SET_REGS and KVM_GET_REGS.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 102 ++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index b3e2eaa2eb..b988fc3abb 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -138,7 +138,6 @@ const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = {
     KVM_CAP_LAST_INFO
 };
 
-static int cap_sync_regs;
 static int cap_async_pf;
 static int cap_mem_op;
 static int cap_mem_op_extension;
@@ -359,7 +358,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
         return -1;
     }
 
-    cap_sync_regs = true;
     cap_async_pf = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF);
     cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
     cap_mem_op_extension = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
@@ -466,15 +464,16 @@ void kvm_s390_reset_vcpu_normal(S390CPU *cpu)
 
 static int can_sync_regs(CPUState *cs, int regs)
 {
-    return cap_sync_regs && (cs->kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & regs) == regs;
+    return (cs->kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & regs) == regs;
 }
 
+#define KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS (KVM_SYNC_GPRS | KVM_SYNC_ACRS | \
+                                KVM_SYNC_CRS | KVM_SYNC_PREFIX)
+
 int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
 {
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
     CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
-    struct kvm_sregs sregs;
-    struct kvm_regs regs;
     struct kvm_fpu fpu = {};
     int r;
     int i;
@@ -483,20 +482,14 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
     cs->kvm_run->psw_addr = env->psw.addr;
     cs->kvm_run->psw_mask = env->psw.mask;
 
-    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_GPRS)) {
-        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs[i] = env->regs[i];
-            cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
-        }
-    } else {
-        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            regs.gprs[i] = env->regs[i];
-        }
-        r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_REGS, &regs);
-        if (r < 0) {
-            return r;
-        }
-    }
+    g_assert((cs->kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS) ==
+             KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS);
+    cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS;
+    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs, env->regs, sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs));
+    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs, env->aregs, sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs));
+    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs, env->cregs, sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs));
+
+    cs->kvm_run->s.regs.prefix = env->psa;
 
     if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_VRS)) {
         for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
@@ -575,25 +568,6 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
         }
     }
 
-    /* access registers and control registers*/
-    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_ACRS | KVM_SYNC_CRS)) {
-        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs[i] = env->aregs[i];
-            cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs[i] = env->cregs[i];
-        }
-        cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_ACRS;
-        cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_CRS;
-    } else {
-        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            sregs.acrs[i] = env->aregs[i];
-            sregs.crs[i] = env->cregs[i];
-        }
-        r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_SREGS, &sregs);
-        if (r < 0) {
-            return r;
-        }
-    }
-
     if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_GSCB)) {
         memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gscb, env->gscb, 32);
         cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GSCB;
@@ -615,13 +589,6 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
         cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_DIAG318;
     }
 
-    /* Finally the prefix */
-    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_PREFIX)) {
-        cs->kvm_run->s.regs.prefix = env->psa;
-        cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_PREFIX;
-    } else {
-        /* prefix is only supported via sync regs */
-    }
     return 0;
 }
 
@@ -629,8 +596,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
 {
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
     CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
-    struct kvm_sregs sregs;
-    struct kvm_regs regs;
     struct kvm_fpu fpu;
     int i, r;
 
@@ -638,37 +603,15 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
     env->psw.addr = cs->kvm_run->psw_addr;
     env->psw.mask = cs->kvm_run->psw_mask;
 
-    /* the GPRS */
-    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_GPRS)) {
-        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            env->regs[i] = cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs[i];
-        }
-    } else {
-        r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_REGS, &regs);
-        if (r < 0) {
-            return r;
-        }
-         for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            env->regs[i] = regs.gprs[i];
-        }
-    }
+    /* the GPRS, ACRS and CRS */
+    g_assert((cs->kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS) ==
+             KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS);
+    memcpy(env->regs, cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs, sizeof(env->regs));
+    memcpy(env->aregs, cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs, sizeof(env->aregs));
+    memcpy(env->cregs, cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs, sizeof(env->cregs));
 
-    /* The ACRS and CRS */
-    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_ACRS | KVM_SYNC_CRS)) {
-        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            env->aregs[i] = cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs[i];
-            env->cregs[i] = cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs[i];
-        }
-    } else {
-        r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_GET_SREGS, &sregs);
-        if (r < 0) {
-            return r;
-        }
-         for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-            env->aregs[i] = sregs.acrs[i];
-            env->cregs[i] = sregs.crs[i];
-        }
-    }
+    /* The prefix */
+    env->psa = cs->kvm_run->s.regs.prefix;
 
     /* Floating point and vector registers */
     if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_VRS)) {
@@ -693,11 +636,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
         env->fpc = fpu.fpc;
     }
 
-    /* The prefix */
-    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_PREFIX)) {
-        env->psa = cs->kvm_run->s.regs.prefix;
-    }
-
     if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_ARCH0)) {
         env->cputm = cs->kvm_run->s.regs.cputm;
         env->ckc = cs->kvm_run->s.regs.ckc;
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/s390x/kvm: Turn KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS into a hard requirement

[Christian Borntraeger]

Am 09.10.23 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> Since we already require at least kernel 3.15 in the s390x KVM code,
> we can assume that the KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS capability is always there.
> Thus turn this into a hard requirement now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>   target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
> index bc5c56a305..b3e2eaa2eb 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -337,21 +337,29 @@ int kvm_arch_get_default_type(MachineState *ms)
>   
>   int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>   {
> +    int required_caps[] = {
> +        KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL,
> +        KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS,
> +    };
> +
> +    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(required_caps); i++) {
> +        if (!kvm_check_extension(s, required_caps[i])) {
> +            error_report("KVM is missing capability #%d - "
> +                         "please use kernel 3.15 or newer", required_caps[i]);
> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>       object_class_foreach(ccw_machine_class_foreach, TYPE_S390_CCW_MACHINE,
>                            false, NULL);
>   
> -    if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL)) {
> -        error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL - "
> -                     "please use kernel 3.15 or newer");
> -        return -1;
> -    }
>       if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
>           error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_S390_COW - "
>                        "unsupported environment");
>           return -1;
>       }

Not sure if we also want to move KVM_CAP_S390_COW somehow. The message would be different.
Aparch from that:
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>


>   
> -    cap_sync_regs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS);
> +    cap_sync_regs = true;
>       cap_async_pf = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF);
>       cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
>       cap_mem_op_extension = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/s390x/kvm: Turn KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS into a hard requirement

[Thomas Huth]

On 10/10/2023 13.02, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 09.10.23 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>> Since we already require at least kernel 3.15 in the s390x KVM code,
>> we can assume that the KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS capability is always there.
>> Thus turn this into a hard requirement now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>> index bc5c56a305..b3e2eaa2eb 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>> @@ -337,21 +337,29 @@ int kvm_arch_get_default_type(MachineState *ms)
>>   int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>>   {
>> +    int required_caps[] = {
>> +        KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL,
>> +        KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS,
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(required_caps); i++) {
>> +        if (!kvm_check_extension(s, required_caps[i])) {
>> +            error_report("KVM is missing capability #%d - "
>> +                         "please use kernel 3.15 or newer", 
>> required_caps[i]);
>> +            return -1;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>>       object_class_foreach(ccw_machine_class_foreach, TYPE_S390_CCW_MACHINE,
>>                            false, NULL);
>> -    if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL)) {
>> -        error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL - "
>> -                     "please use kernel 3.15 or newer");
>> -        return -1;
>> -    }
>>       if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
>>           error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_S390_COW - "
>>                        "unsupported environment");
>>           return -1;
>>       }
> 
> Not sure if we also want to move KVM_CAP_S390_COW somehow. The message would 
> be different.

IIRC that error could happen when you ran KVM within an older version of 
z/VM, so the "please use kernel 3.15 or newer" message would be completely 
misleading there.

> Aparch from that:
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks,
   Thomas

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/s390x/kvm: Turn KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS into a hard requirement

[Christian Borntraeger]

Am 10.10.23 um 13:12 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> On 10/10/2023 13.02, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 09.10.23 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>>> Since we already require at least kernel 3.15 in the s390x KVM code,
>>> we can assume that the KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS capability is always there.
>>> Thus turn this into a hard requirement now.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>>> index bc5c56a305..b3e2eaa2eb 100644
>>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>>> @@ -337,21 +337,29 @@ int kvm_arch_get_default_type(MachineState *ms)
>>>   int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>>>   {
>>> +    int required_caps[] = {
>>> +        KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL,
>>> +        KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS,
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(required_caps); i++) {
>>> +        if (!kvm_check_extension(s, required_caps[i])) {
>>> +            error_report("KVM is missing capability #%d - "
>>> +                         "please use kernel 3.15 or newer", required_caps[i]);
>>> +            return -1;
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>       object_class_foreach(ccw_machine_class_foreach, TYPE_S390_CCW_MACHINE,
>>>                            false, NULL);
>>> -    if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL)) {
>>> -        error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL - "
>>> -                     "please use kernel 3.15 or newer");
>>> -        return -1;
>>> -    }
>>>       if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
>>>           error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_S390_COW - "
>>>                        "unsupported environment");
>>>           return -1;
>>>       }
>>
>> Not sure if we also want to move KVM_CAP_S390_COW somehow. The message would be different.
> 
> IIRC that error could happen when you ran KVM within an older version of z/VM, so the "please use kernel 3.15 or newer" message would be completely misleading there.

Yes, thats what I was trying to say, we would need a different message.
Lets go with this patch.
> 
>> Aparch from that:
>> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks,
>    Thomas
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] target/s390x/kvm: Simplify the GPRs, ACRs, CRs and prefix synchronization code

[Christian Borntraeger]

Am 09.10.23 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Huth:
[...]

> @@ -483,20 +482,14 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
>       cs->kvm_run->psw_addr = env->psw.addr;
>       cs->kvm_run->psw_mask = env->psw.mask;
>   
> -    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_GPRS)) {
> -        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> -            cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs[i] = env->regs[i];
> -            cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
> -        }
> -    } else {
> -        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> -            regs.gprs[i] = env->regs[i];
> -        }
> -        r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_REGS, &regs);
> -        if (r < 0) {
> -            return r;
> -        }
> -    }
> +    g_assert((cs->kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS) ==
> +             KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS);
> +    cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS;
> +    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs, env->regs, sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs));


> +    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs, env->aregs, sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs));
> +    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs, env->cregs, sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs));
> +
> +    cs->kvm_run->s.regs.prefix = env->psa;

These 3 have only been saved for level> KVM_PUT_RUNTIME_STATE. By moving the memcpy
into this position you would always write them. Probably ok but a change in
behaviour. Was this intentional?

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] target/s390x/kvm: Simplify the GPRs, ACRs, CRs and prefix synchronization code

[Thomas Huth]

On 10/10/2023 13.41, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 09.10.23 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> [...]
> 
>> @@ -483,20 +482,14 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
>>       cs->kvm_run->psw_addr = env->psw.addr;
>>       cs->kvm_run->psw_mask = env->psw.mask;
>> -    if (can_sync_regs(cs, KVM_SYNC_GPRS)) {
>> -        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>> -            cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs[i] = env->regs[i];
>> -            cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
>> -        }
>> -    } else {
>> -        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>> -            regs.gprs[i] = env->regs[i];
>> -        }
>> -        r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_SET_REGS, &regs);
>> -        if (r < 0) {
>> -            return r;
>> -        }
>> -    }
>> +    g_assert((cs->kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS) ==
>> +             KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS);
>> +    cs->kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_REQUIRED_BITS;
>> +    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs, env->regs, 
>> sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.gprs));
> 
> 
>> +    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs, env->aregs, 
>> sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.acrs));
>> +    memcpy(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs, env->cregs, 
>> sizeof(cs->kvm_run->s.regs.crs));
>> +
>> +    cs->kvm_run->s.regs.prefix = env->psa;
> 
> These 3 have only been saved for level> KVM_PUT_RUNTIME_STATE. By moving the 
> memcpy
> into this position you would always write them. Probably ok but a change in
> behaviour. Was this intentional?

Oops, no, I missed that early return in the function. I'll fix it and send a v3.

  Thanks!
   Thomas