From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B3AC433E0 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B592B64F04 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:54:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B592B64F04 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38364 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMyio-0001pB-J3 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:54:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMyhQ-00017d-4J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:52:52 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:52915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMyhO-0002cV-N7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:52:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616097169; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KRKrk0uqJhvi6onVEPXF/gUuEZG2ykiPrVykaIV4/kI=; b=I9P6DphQnrbgCkwmPWfuYAQ5LqJ9u+WMYxAZHFUaYIHhlVpjM232EzSpSrKnzroCBoiDRq KKehZos8OKoNvoo5fi5QOasUzAYaiQ+U5w5sfYmf6Q4wdeuj3FjNRLd6UPYgT0nDKcoP7F 4KHEWti+tU9uhGQhwl8yBjTiRbW4bRM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-73-aU5SRpVfP8GpydU8cJw-Lw-1; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:52:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aU5SRpVfP8GpydU8cJw-Lw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D07107ACCA; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.117.64] (ovpn-117-64.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.117.64]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FBD60CD7; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI To: Stefan Hajnoczi , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= References: From: John Snow Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:52:41 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jsnow@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=jsnow@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.249, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , "Daniel P . Berrange" , qemu-devel , Cleber Rosa , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 3/18/21 3:46 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 09:29:32PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Now I'm having serious doubts about Gitlab usefulness for the QEMU >> community... > > The QEMU Project has 50,000 minutes of GitLab CI quota. Let's enable > GitLab Merge Requests so that anyone can submit a merge request and get > CI coverage. > How does this workflow work? I push to my branch, I submit a MR, CI runs? I suppose there must be a way for me to disable a CI run on my branch if I intend to trigger it via a MR, to avoid eating minutes twice. --js > I think we need to expect free tiers to be insufficient for full CI > coverage. In the longer term we probably need to rely on dedicated > runners, although I'm not sure how much of the issue is QEMU's huge CI > pipeline versus the performance limitations of shared runners. > > Stefan >