qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Infinite loop in bus_unparent(), qdev bug or qdev misuse?
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 18:26:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4df3ba3-4759-56ac-68f8-f75eea93e27e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875zda8j3m.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On 05/05/20 18:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> That's a good one, and especially a safe one, since it matches
>> qdev_device_add.  It has the disadvantage of having to touch all
>> qdev_create() calls.
> 
> Also, it moves onboard devices from /machine/unattached/ to
> /machine/peripheral-anon/.

Uh indeed.  No that's too ugly.

>> Even better however would be to move the bus argument (and thus
>> qdev_set_parent_bus) to qdev_init, and likewise in qdev_device_add move
>> qdev_set_id after qemu_opt_foreach.  I looked at the property setters
>> and couldn't find anything suspicious (somewhat to my surprise), but I
>> haven't honestly tried.
> 
> Thus, we satisfy bus_unparent()'s precondition "bus children have a QOM
> parent"[*] by moving "add to parent bus" next to the place where we
> ensure "has QOM parent" by putting orphans under /machine/unattached/.
> Makes sense.
> 
> If we add to the bus first, the precondition ceases to hold until we
> realize.  Ugly, but harmless unless we manage to actually call the
> function then.

Shouldn't be a big deal, since users should call either qdev_set_id or
object_property_add_child before device_set_realized.

> I suspect we can't realize first, because the realize method may want to
> use the parent bus.

Right.

Moving the bus to qdev_init would be quite large but hopefully scriptable.

Paolo



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-05 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-04 14:38 Infinite loop in bus_unparent(), qdev bug or qdev misuse? Markus Armbruster
2020-05-04 14:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-04 15:25   ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-05 16:03   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-05 16:26     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-05-06  6:39       ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-12 15:58         ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-12 18:43           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-05  8:23 ` no-reply
2020-05-05  8:24 ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4df3ba3-4759-56ac-68f8-f75eea93e27e@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).