From: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: sw@weilnetz.de, kkostiuk@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
"Yonggang Luo" <luoyonggang@gmail.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Bin Meng" <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sysemu/os-win32: fix setjmp/longjmp on windows-arm64
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:16:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a577e67a-d86b-86e9-8844-82a3814f83d4@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70e1b283-ac58-9df4-7e19-2ead4c680424@linaro.org>
On 2/14/23 08:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Pierrick,
>
> On 13/2/23 17:13, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>> Windows implementation of setjmp/longjmp is done in
>> C:/WINDOWS/system32/ucrtbase.dll. Alas, on arm64, it seems to *always*
>> perform stack unwinding, which crashes from generated code.
>>
>> By using alternative implementation built in mingw, we avoid doing stack
>> unwinding and this fixes crash when calling longjmp.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> include/sysemu/os-win32.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/sysemu/os-win32.h b/include/sysemu/os-win32.h
>> index 5b38c7bd04..84f62d0a17 100644
>> --- a/include/sysemu/os-win32.h
>> +++ b/include/sysemu/os-win32.h
>> @@ -51,14 +51,28 @@ typedef struct sockaddr_un {
>> extern "C" {
>> #endif
>>
>> -#if defined(_WIN64)
>> +#if defined(__aarch64__)
>
> Shouldn't we check for __MINGW64__?
>
> #if defined(__aarch64__) && defined(__MINGW64__)
>
I thought QEMU was only compiled using MinGW under Windows, (from CI,
that's the case, [1], [2]), but maybe that's a wrong assumption.
[1]
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.d/windows.yml
[2]
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-win64-cross.docker
For windows-arm64, we need an alternative setjmp/longjmp implementation
(__builtin_setjmp and __builtin_longjmp in clang are not available),
thus, that makes MinGW mandatory, at least for this platform.
Would adding this be satisfying? Or better to add this check in Meson?
#ifndef __MINGW64__
#error MinGW must be available for this platform
#endif
>> +/* On windows-arm64, setjmp is available in only one variant, and longjmp always
>> + * does stack unwinding. This crash with generated code.
>> + * Thus, we use another implementation of setjmp (not windows one), coming from
>> + * mingw, which never performs stack unwinding. */
>> +#undef setjmp
>> +#undef longjmp
>> +/* These functions are not declared in setjmp.h because __aarch64__ defines
>> + * setjmp to _setjmpex instead. However, they are still defined in libmingwex.a,
>> + * which gets linked automatically. */
>
> So this is not stable. Better would be to check the symbols availability
> at link-time via meson; see for example glusterfs_ftruncate_has_stat
> which defines CONFIG_GLUSTERFS_FTRUNCATE_HAS_STAT.
>
> A similar check could define CONFIG_MINGW64_HAS_SETJMP_LONGJMP.
>
You're right, it's not stable. Checking this using meson sounds a good
approach.
>> +extern int __mingw_setjmp(jmp_buf);
>> +extern void __attribute__((noreturn)) __mingw_longjmp(jmp_buf, int);
>> +#define setjmp(env) __mingw_setjmp(env)
>> +#define longjmp(env, val) __mingw_longjmp(env, val)
>> +#elif defined(_WIN64)
>> /* On w64, setjmp is implemented by _setjmp which needs a second parameter.
>> * If this parameter is NULL, longjump does no stack unwinding.
>> * That is what we need for QEMU. Passing the value of register rsp (default)
>> * lets longjmp try a stack unwinding which will crash with generated code. */
>> # undef setjmp
>> # define setjmp(env) _setjmp(env, NULL)
>> -#endif
>> +#endif /* __aarch64__ */
>> /* QEMU uses sigsetjmp()/siglongjmp() as the portable way to specify
>> * "longjmp and don't touch the signal masks". Since we know that the
>> * savemask parameter will always be zero we can safely define these
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-13 16:13 [PATCH 0/4] Adds support for running QEMU natively on windows-arm64 Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-13 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] util/cacheflush: fix illegal instruction " Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-14 16:44 ` Peter Maydell
2023-02-14 17:02 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-15 12:49 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-15 18:22 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-16 12:53 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-13 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] sysemu/os-win32: fix setjmp/longjmp " Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-14 7:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-14 8:16 ` Pierrick Bouvier [this message]
2023-02-13 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] qga/vss-win32: fix warning for clang++-15 Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-13 16:20 ` Konstantin Kostiuk
2023-02-13 18:08 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-02-13 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] target/ppc: fix warning with clang-15 Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-13 18:08 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-02-14 7:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-14 7:57 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2023-02-14 18:10 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-15 10:58 ` Pierrick Bouvier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a577e67a-d86b-86e9-8844-82a3814f83d4@linaro.org \
--to=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=kkostiuk@redhat.com \
--cc=luoyonggang@gmail.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).