Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] ahci-test: Add dependency to qemu-img tool

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>]

On 1/28/19 8:14 PM, John Snow wrote:
> On 1/28/19 11:08 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 25.01.2019 um 22:57 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>>> On 1/25/19 3:34 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Since the ahci-test uses qemu-img, add a dependency to build it
>>>> before using it.
>>>> This fixes:
>>>>
>>>>   $ gmake check-qtest V=1
>>>>   QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img tests/ahci-test
>>>>   Failed to execute child process "/tmp/qemu-test.19tMRF/qemu-img" (No such file or directory)
>>>>   ERROR:tests/libqos/libqos.c:192:mkimg: assertion failed: (ret && !err)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> RFC because while this dependency is valid, I don't think this is the
>>>> clever way to solve this problem (which is, assuming the host
>>>> distribution has the qemu-tools installed).
>>>> I guess remember a thread about it (Eric, John?) where it was asked
>>>> "What do we want to test, qemu-img or AHCI? Can we trust an unstable
>>>> version of a tool to verify a device?"
>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>>
>> Are you taking this through your tree, or through which tree should it
>> be merged?
>>
>> Kevin
>>
> 
> I can, but it'd be the only patch I have this week. If it's not a
> burden, would you mind including it?

Actually there are few follow up patches slighly related (not AHCI), so
it indeed makes sense Kevin takes them. I'll respin.