From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBLdi-0005pY-2E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:38:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBLdd-0001aT-3r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:38:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]:36699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBLdc-0001aJ-TL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:38:45 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id h64so6040916pge.3 for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:38:44 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170510083259.3900-1-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> <9626326d-977f-bf26-851a-59d420f27993@redhat.com> <0900def5-6049-4338-1eb0-8a0404c6c839@gmail.com> <1120538601.8977419.1495093937424.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: Xiao Guangrong Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 21:38:48 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1120538601.8977419.1495093937424.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] mc146818rtc: fix Windows VM clock faster List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: mst@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, Xiao Guangrong , yunfangtai@tencent.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 05/18/2017 03:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>> Looks great. Thanks for following up quickly on the reviews. >> >> Paolo, if it is okay to you, could you please consider to merge this >> patchset? ;) > > Yes, I've already queued it, but I don't have many patches so I am > delaying the pull request a bit (until at least I have time to test > vhost-user-scsi...). > Very glad to know it. I should check your git tree before raise this kind of request next time. :) > In the meanwhile, it would be great if you prepared a qtest for the > problem of too many interrupts when the periodic timer is reprogrammed > continuously. > Sure, will do it, thanks for your suggestion.