Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] s390: Convert virtio-ccw, cpu to three-phase reset, and followup cleanup

[Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 15:38 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 15:58, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> > 
> > The main aim of this patchseries is to remove the two remaining uses
> > of device_class_set_parent_reset() in the tree, which are virtio-ccw
> > and the s390 CPU class. Doing that lets us do some followup cleanup.
> > (The diffstat looks alarming but is almost all coccinelle automated
> > changes.)
> > 
> > Changes v1->v2:
> >  * new patch 1 to convert hw/s390/ccw-device
> >    (fixes bug discovered via s390 CI testing in v1)
> >  * a couple of patches are already upstream
> >  * in the target/s390 cpu patch, fix sigp_cpu_reset() to use
> >    RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_NORMAL
> >  * new patches 10, 11 which take advantage of the new function
> >    device_class_set_legacy_reset() to allow us to replace the
> >    generic Resettable transitional_function machinery with a
> >    simple wrapper that adapts from the API of the hold method
> >    to the one used by the legacy reset method
> > 
> > Patches 1, 10, 11 need review. I believe that patch 1 should have
> > fixed the intermittent s390 issue we found with v1 of the patchset,
> > but if you could run these through the s390 CI again I'd
> > appreciate it.
> 
> I'm going to apply this series to my target-arm.next queue.
> 
> Let me know if you need more time to CI/test/whatever it on
> the s390 side before it goes upstream.

CI looks good.
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM