From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTpvD-0001PA-Kd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:05:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTpv9-0000mr-JU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:05:03 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTpv9-0000mQ-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:04:59 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx16.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8501C3674A5 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:04:59 +0000 (UTC) References: <20170117180051.11958-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> <50210df4-dcd8-8b2e-daab-d0c53449689a@redhat.com> <20170118125246.GT3491@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <455f3089-c690-fb19-a861-aa18c07b6812@redhat.com> <20170118125820.GX3491@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:04:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170118125820.GX3491@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arch_init: Remove unnecessary default_config_files table List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov On 18/01/2017 13:58, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 01:55:21PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 18/01/2017 13:52, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>>> >>>> Though maybe we should just remove .conf file support completely... >>>> who's using it?!? >>> You mean removing /etc/qemu.conf, or removing -readconfig >>> completely? >>> >>> The former doesn't seem to be used often. The latter looks very >>> useful for people trying to write scripts around QEMU and to >>> avoid command-line length limits, so I will be surprised if >>> nobody is using it. >> >> Of course /etc/qemu.conf only (so that -nodefconfig/-nouserconfig become >> no-ops). > > Agreed. Should we print a warning in 2.9 and remove it in 2.10? I would just remove it, but that sounds like a plan too. :) Paolo