From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, mst@redhat.com, liq3ea@gmail.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 for 3.1 0/4] Fix possible OOB during queuing packets
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:04:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a61a2c9d-0366-b91b-b485-bb774581a34d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.1811301446050.9903@xnncv>
On 2018/11/30 下午5:18, P J P wrote:
> +-- On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Eric Blake wrote --+
> | How important is this for 3.1? We've missed -rc3. Is this CVE quality
> | because of a guest being able to cause mayhem by intentionally getting into
> | this condition (in which case, we need it, as well as a CVE assigned)?
Yes, malicious guest can do this, but only with some specific setup e.g
with hubports.
> Is it
> | pre-existing in 3.0 at which point waiting for 4.0 is no worse off than what
> | we already are?
>
> It is a revised patch to fix 'CVE-2018-17963' issue. Earlier patch was
> included in -rc0.
>
> $ git tag --contains 1592a9947036d60dde5404204a5d45975133caf5
> v3.1.0-rc0
> v3.1.0-rc1
> v3.1.0-rc2
> v3.1.0-rc3
>
> Thank you.
> --
> Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
> 47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F
>
Yes, it could be treated as a follow up fixes for CVE-2018-17963. I
think we need this.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-30 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 12:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 for 3.1 0/4] Fix possible OOB during queuing packets Jason Wang
2018-11-29 12:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 for 3.1 1/4] net: drop too large packet early Jason Wang
2018-11-29 12:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 for 3.1 2/4] virtio-net-test: remove unused macro Jason Wang
2018-11-29 12:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 for 3.1 3/4] virtio-net-test: accept variable length argument in pci_test_start() Jason Wang
2018-11-29 12:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 for 3.1 4/4] virtio-net-test: add large tx buffer test Jason Wang
2018-11-29 13:53 ` Thomas Huth
2018-11-29 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 for 3.1 0/4] Fix possible OOB during queuing packets Eric Blake
2018-11-30 9:18 ` P J P
2018-11-30 13:04 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-11-30 13:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a61a2c9d-0366-b91b-b485-bb774581a34d@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=liq3ea@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).