From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHv7k-0004Sj-23 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:17:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHv7j-000390-61 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:17:16 -0500 References: <1511456107-7081-1-git-send-email-deepa.srinivasan@oracle.com> <3DFDA265-8685-4601-B981-1BB0007C44B4@oracle.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:17:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3DFDA265-8685-4601-B981-1BB0007C44B4@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Fix qemu crash when using scsi-block List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Deepa Srinivasan , stefanha@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mark.kanda@oracle.com Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk On 23/11/2017 18:05, Deepa Srinivasan wrote: > blk_aio_prwv() now takes a void pointer and the coroutine functions > have been modified to cast it into QEMUIOVector if needed. It does > not use an union in BlkRwCo since this leads to code - blk_aio_prwv() > would have to write to the void pointer member, but coroutines would > sometimes read the QEMUIOVector member. Paolo also suggested not > using a union. > > Note that a similar issue exists in > blk_ioctl()/blk_ioctl_entry()/blk_prw() where blk_prw() always > creates the QEMUIOVector even if blk_ioctl()/blk_ioctl_entry() does > not need a QEMUIOVector. This will need to be fixed separately to > keep it consistent with the AIO path. For that it's probably simplest to inline blk_prw into blk_ioctl and remove all the cruft: diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c index 45d9101be3..ceab3166bc 100644 --- a/block/block-backend.c +++ b/block/block-backend.c @@ -1404,12 +1404,28 @@ static void blk_ioctl_entry(void *opaque) { BlkRwCo *rwco = opaque; rwco->ret = blk_co_ioctl(rwco->blk, rwco->offset, - rwco->qiov->iov[0].iov_base); + rwco->iobuf); } int blk_ioctl(BlockBackend *blk, unsigned long int req, void *buf) { - return blk_prw(blk, req, buf, 0, blk_ioctl_entry, 0); + BlkRwCo rwco = (BlkRwCo) { + .blk = blk, + .iobuf = buf, + .offset = req, + .ret = NOT_DONE, + }; + + if (qemu_in_coroutine()) { + /* Fast-path if already in coroutine context */ + blk_ioctl_entry(&rwco); + } else { + Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(blk_ioctl_entry, &rwco); + bdrv_coroutine_enter(blk_bs(blk), co); + BDRV_POLL_WHILE(blk_bs(blk), rwco.ret == NOT_DONE); + } + + return rwco.ret; } static void blk_aio_ioctl_entry(void *opaque) Thanks, Paolo