From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E93C5C433F5 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhH4e-0007Qx-0Z for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:37:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGpY-0001AG-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:21:40 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x33.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::33]:38215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGpW-0005X3-DS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:21:39 -0400 Received: by mail-oa1-x33.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-e5e433d66dso3208225fac.5 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:21:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EMvO2IebofbBpkprHung1DIql5Coz6j/X0YCht4hUzM=; b=pvYkCIXsynIsVTegzxF/MBxaFT3ZHFz6cL68bXmFVPAGQqK8aewK3JDP1AvuldjwaO 0c5IVsneKzj76eJ8FYtX1Vf9S6Fa5A4U37PXk/AS6sPLrgCvH6X0rpC/Ozv8VXOKiyqM gbA5albvD+Zj8ZM2acvUo875BECuttBjh1gbfmMK2ZgS/VUnYtFPSoNFoeKvGEXwx+Qp fH/AmqSC1FB9IfkCioFTMCRIkpH51zpzry5Xgld+mEdpOA6jAD1YLQSBG1g9gfeujKP7 Ksa2eXKfA5VXcRv6faX5MAs54bHZNrJyZkQ6BLIhyaCHWke20fbX/fZWJ+gIT36PTE1e T3Fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EMvO2IebofbBpkprHung1DIql5Coz6j/X0YCht4hUzM=; b=ujDjEKEw/XPlaN8Ikc8MwLmEWZLTaKhBy7G+bV8Hr1hgf8iQpY3gJ2dj4kqbCbm9PS 70KtbwhaF6LjS8cRrq072/QiITWNDveV3K8Il67Y5s6If93kYr8Ttw1Zfn+x6LYrj/kA 9c9YMoWmNrVSFz82YxMjW6rXF9i8at51W2jpDoY6t/HELjNYnsSU1EI5MIJdx9YjBWum Bgsg+EbddN6MHppM8rMika9MSLSATsSfUuWcbvYR1YYGvniiIfvDGqYS2pkLpkzZPpaX w6xDSXcPmRzCsj1bTwRggun8vCeZ8uFA6RZKhQ0A140YV+G3uxuyR1ywNEwTZ0l/vcel 8IBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SmrMDTQ5Tpu7DJgErENhapH7Adks8q+ODeusrlIU22RWzorTC SLIvNSZ4a1uTO84E18a+pqY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGBjK44qK6HOyZYZMUhHk+QNcQjDFHyGrsPmMWs1JgsDDPV6C9cFkQREA052gZ4tKOOGSblg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:1ca:b0:e5:a8db:a93f with SMTP id q10-20020a05687101ca00b000e5a8dba93fmr2392260oad.232.1650486096819; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.222] ([179.225.252.195]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o19-20020a4a9593000000b0032176119e65sm7055959ooi.34.2022.04.20.13.21.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:21:33 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: Future of libslirp in QEMU Content-Language: en-US To: Anders Pitman , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <8f5cc095-e5e9-486d-8e52-d22cac6d2379@www.fastmail.com> From: Daniel Henrique Barboza In-Reply-To: <8f5cc095-e5e9-486d-8e52-d22cac6d2379@www.fastmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4860:4864:20::33; envelope-from=danielhb413@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa1-x33.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 4/20/22 16:08, Anders Pitman wrote: > I noticed in the 7.0 changelog that libslirp might be removed as a submodule in the future. Since user networking is very important for my project, I'm wondering if this is simply an implementation detail, or if there are plans to eventually remove slirp support entirely from QEMU (which would be bad for me)? > > Is there somewhere I can read the discussion about this? I searched the mailing list archives but didn't see anything obvious. QEMU will still be supporting libslirp. The difference is that now QEMU will be using libslirp from the distro instead of packaging it itself. The relevant thread is here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-04/msg00974.html Thanks, Daniel