qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: aihua liang <aliang@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev-backup: don't check aio_context too early
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 18:55:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7ce7d95-7c77-b087-372f-a22b4dc8bfcd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190507085021.GB5808@localhost.localdomain>


On 5/7/19 4:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 06.05.2019 um 22:33 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>> in blockdev_backup_prepare, we check to make sure that the target is
>> associated with a compatible aio context. However, do_blockdev_backup is
>> called later and has some logic to move the target to a compatible
>> aio_context. The transaction version will fail certain commands
>> needlessly early as a result.
>>
>> Allow blockdev_backup_prepare to simply call do_blockdev_backup, which
>> will ultimately decide if the contexts are compatible or not.
>>
>> Note: the transaction version has always disallowed this operation since
>> its initial commit bd8baecd (2014), whereas the version of
>> qmp_blockdev_backup at the time, from commit c29c1dd312f, tried to
>> enforce the aio_context switch instead. It's not clear, and I can't see
>> from the mailing list archives at the time, why the two functions take a
>> different approach. It wasn't until later in efd7556708b (2016) that the
>> standalone version tried to determine if it could set the context or
>> not.
>>
>> Reported-by: aihua liang <aliang@redhat.com>
>> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683498
> 
> Signed-off-by is missing, and a testcase, too. :-)
> 
>> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
>> index 79fbac8450..a81d88980c 100644
>> --- a/blockdev.c
>> +++ b/blockdev.c
>> @@ -1872,10 +1872,6 @@ static void blockdev_backup_prepare(BlkActionState *common, Error **errp)
>>      }
>>  
>>      aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
>> -    if (aio_context != bdrv_get_aio_context(target)) {
>> -        error_setg(errp, "Backup between two IO threads is not implemented");
>> -        return;
>> -    }
>>      aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
>>      state->bs = bs;
> 
> The actual change looks good to me.
> 
> Kevin
> 

(See the Red Hat BZ for details on the test I am more or less trying to
replicate in iotests -- but the jist of it is using an iothread on one
device and not specifying one for the other, then backing up both to two
blockdev-add created nodes not attached to any device.)

Is there some trick to getting this to fail with accel=qtest? I'm
noticing that if the VM is paused or if I use accel=qtest, the iothread
contexts for the drives appear to go ... unresolved? and the test passes.

I've only had luck (so far) reproducing this with accel=kvm on a running
VM (the drives can be empty) and I don't actually know why that is just
yet -- I guess these aio_context objects get resolved at runtime?

Anyway, this seems to be a little tricky so far, maybe you have some
advice for me?

--js

(Also note: doing a full backup and an incremental backup for two
perfectly empty 64GB qcow2 drives takes over 6 seconds in total. It
probably shouldn't, right? There's something about the initial backup
that appears to take a pretty long time.)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-08 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-06 20:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev-backup: don't check aio_context too early John Snow
2019-05-07  8:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-05-07 14:19   ` John Snow
2019-05-08 22:55   ` John Snow [this message]
2019-05-09  8:00     ` Kevin Wolf
2019-05-09 18:31       ` John Snow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7ce7d95-7c77-b087-372f-a22b4dc8bfcd@redhat.com \
    --to=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliang@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).