qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] s390x: Add sclp boundary check and fix error priority
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:14:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7f404a1-7985-e506-db3e-815bb6d8e8cc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7ee2ad4-d928-88f1-94d6-3f6b22d2da72@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2913 bytes --]

On 9/27/19 10:51 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.09.19 13:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> * All sclp codes need to be checked for page boundary violations.
>> * Requests over 4k are not a spec exception.
>> * Invalid command checking has to be done before the boundary check.
> 
> Can we split this patch up so we fix one thing at a time?

Sure, but we would end up with very small patches.
Do you want that?

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/s390x/event-facility.c |  3 ---
>>  hw/s390x/sclp.c           | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>> index 797ecbb..6620569 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>> @@ -377,9 +377,6 @@ static void command_handler(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb, uint64_t code)
>>      case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK:
>>          write_event_mask(ef, sccb);
>>          break;
>> -    default:
>> -        sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
>> -        break;
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> index fac7c3b..76feac8 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> @@ -213,14 +213,33 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
>>      cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
>>  
>>      /* Valid sccb sizes */
>> -    if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < sizeof(SCCBHeader) ||
>> -        be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) > SCCB_SIZE) {
>> +    if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < sizeof(SCCBHeader)) {
>>          r = -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
>>          goto out;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
>> +    switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) {
>> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO:
>> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED:
>> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO:
>> +    case SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_IOA:
>> +    case SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_IOA:
>> +    case SCLP_CMD_READ_EVENT_DATA:
>> +    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA:
>> +    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK:
>> +        break;
>> +    default:
>> +        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
>> +        goto out_write;
>> +    }
>>  
>> +    if ((sccb + work_sccb.h.length) > ((sccb & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> +        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
>> +        goto out_write;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
>> +out_write:
>>      cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb,
>>                                be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
>>  
>>
> 
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-27  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-26 11:33 [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x: SCLP error cleanup Claudio Imbrenda
2019-09-26 11:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] s390x: Add sclp boundary check and fix error priority Claudio Imbrenda
2019-09-26 12:21   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-27  8:51   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-27  9:14     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-09-27  9:17       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-27  9:20         ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-27  9:29           ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 11:33 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] s390x: Fix SCLP return code when buffer too small Claudio Imbrenda
2019-09-26 12:20   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-26 12:26     ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x: SCLP error cleanup David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7f404a1-7985-e506-db3e-815bb6d8e8cc@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).