From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
kwolf@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotests: Extend non-shared storage migration test (194)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:51:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a80aaf11-a962-c9d6-e271-c8ad5e1365b7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170828112952.22965-1-kchamart@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3991 bytes --]
On 08/28/2017 06:29 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> This is the follow-up patch that was discussed[*] as part of feedback to
> qemu-iotest 194.
>
> Changes in this patch:
>
> - Supply 'job-id' parameter to `drive-mirror` invocation.
>
> - Issue `block-job-cancel` command on the source QEMU to gracefully
> complete the mirroring operation.
>
> - Stop the NBD server on the destination QEMU.
>
> - Finally, exit once the event BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED is emitted.
>
> With the above, the test will also be (almost) in sync with the
> procedure outlined in the document live-block-operations.rst[+]
> (section: "QMP invocation for live storage migration with
> ``drive-mirror`` + NBD").
>
> [*] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg04820.html
> -- qemu-iotests: add 194 non-shared storage migration test
> [+] https://git.qemu.org/gitweb.cgi?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=docs/interop/live-block-operations.rst
>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
> ---
> I wonder:
> - Is it worth printing the MIGRATION event state change?
I think waiting for both the BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED and MIGRATION events
make sense (in other words, let's check both events in the expected
order, rather than just one or the other).
> - Since we're not checking on the MIGRATION event anymore, can
> the migration state change events related code (that is triggerred
> by setting 'migrate-set-capabilities') be simply removed?
If we're going to mirror libvirt's non-shared storage migration
sequence, I think we want to keep everything, rather than drop the
migration half.
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/194 | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> tests/qemu-iotests/194.out | 14 ++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/194 b/tests/qemu-iotests/194
> index 8028111e21bed5cf4a2e8e32dc04aa5a9ea9caca..8d746be9d0033f478f11886ee93f95b0fa55bab0 100755
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/194
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/194
> @@ -46,16 +46,17 @@ iotests.log('Launching NBD server on destination...')
> iotests.log(dest_vm.qmp('nbd-server-start', addr={'type': 'unix', 'data': {'path': nbd_sock_path}}))
> iotests.log(dest_vm.qmp('nbd-server-add', device='drive0', writable=True))
>
> -iotests.log('Starting drive-mirror on source...')
> +iotests.log('Starting `drive-mirror` on source...')
> iotests.log(source_vm.qmp(
> 'drive-mirror',
> device='drive0',
> target='nbd+unix:///drive0?socket={0}'.format(nbd_sock_path),
> sync='full',
> format='raw', # always raw, the server handles the format
> - mode='existing'))
> + mode='existing',
> + job_id='mirror-job0'))
>
> -iotests.log('Waiting for drive-mirror to complete...')
> +iotests.log('Waiting for `drive-mirror` to complete...')
So, up to here is okay,
> iotests.log(source_vm.event_wait('BLOCK_JOB_READY'),
> filters=[iotests.filter_qmp_event])
>
> @@ -66,8 +67,14 @@ dest_vm.qmp('migrate-set-capabilities',
> capabilities=[{'capability': 'events', 'state': True}])
> iotests.log(source_vm.qmp('migrate', uri='unix:{0}'.format(migration_sock_path)))
>
> +iotests.log('Gracefully ending the `drive-mirror` job on source...')
> +iotests.log(source_vm.qmp('block-job-cancel', device='mirror-job0'))
> +
> +iotests.log('Stopping the NBD server on destination...')
> +iotests.log(dest_vm.qmp('nbd-server-stop'))
> +
> while True:
> - event = source_vm.event_wait('MIGRATION')
> + event = source_vm.event_wait('BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED')
And this event makes sense for catching the block-job-cancel, but I
think you STILL want to keep a while loop for catching migration as well.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-28 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-28 11:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotests: Extend non-shared storage migration test (194) Kashyap Chamarthy
2017-08-28 14:51 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-08-28 15:35 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a80aaf11-a962-c9d6-e271-c8ad5e1365b7@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kchamart@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).