From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: maz@kernel.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
imammedo@redhat.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, david@redhat.com,
philmd@linaro.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
darren@os.amperecomputing.com, ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com,
vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com, karl.heubaum@oracle.com,
miguel.luis@oracle.com, salil.mehta@opnsrc.net,
zhukeqian1@huawei.com, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com,
wangyanan55@huawei.com, jiakernel2@gmail.com,
maobibo@loongson.cn, lixianglai@loongson.cn, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation,parking} code
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 09:17:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8861b68-5e04-5127-5c0f-77816401741b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230930001933.2660-2-salil.mehta@huawei.com>
On 9/30/23 10:19, Salil Mehta wrote:
> KVM vCPU creation is done once during the initialization of the VM when Qemu
> threads are spawned. This is common to all the architectures.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
thread is spawned.
>
> Hot-unplug of vCPU results in destruction of the vCPU objects in QOM but
> the KVM vCPU objects in the Host KVM are not destroyed and their representative
> KVM vCPU objects/context in Qemu are parked.
>
> Refactor common logic so that some APIs could be reused by vCPU Hotplug code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> ---
> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 14 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index ff1578bb32..b8c36ba50a 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
> #endif
>
> struct KVMParkedVcpu {
> - unsigned long vcpu_id;
> + int vcpu_id;
@vcpu_id represents the vCPU index (CPUState::cpu_index) instead of the
architectural CPU ID any more. However, I don't understand how it works
for x86, and more comments regarding it can be seen below.
> int kvm_fd;
> QLIST_ENTRY(KVMParkedVcpu) node;
> };
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static QemuMutex kml_slots_lock;
> #define kvm_slots_unlock() qemu_mutex_unlock(&kml_slots_lock)
>
> static void kvm_slot_init_dirty_bitmap(KVMSlot *mem);
> +static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, int vcpu_id);
>
> static inline void kvm_resample_fd_remove(int gsi)
> {
> @@ -320,11 +321,49 @@ err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> +{
> + int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
> + struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
> + vcpu->vcpu_id = vcpu_id;
> + vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu, node);
> +}
> +
@vcpu_id can be dropped as suggested previously.
vcpu->vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
> +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> +{
> + int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
> + KVMState *s = kvm_state;
> + int kvm_fd;
> +
> + DPRINTF("kvm_create_vcpu\n");
> +
> + /* check if the KVM vCPU already exist but is parked */
> + kvm_fd = kvm_get_vcpu(s, vcpu_id);
> + if (kvm_fd < 0) {
> + /* vCPU not parked: create a new KVM vCPU */
> + kvm_fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, vcpu_id);
> + if (kvm_fd < 0) {
> + error_report("KVM_CREATE_VCPU IOCTL failed for vCPU %d", vcpu_id);
> + return kvm_fd;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
> + cpu->kvm_fd = kvm_fd;
> + cpu->kvm_state = s;
> + cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
> + cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
The comments here can be dropped since the code is self-explaining.
@vcpu_id represents vCPU index, instead of the architecrual vCPU ID any more.
@vcpu_id is passed to host through ioctl(KVM_CREATE_VCPU), which is expected
as an architecrual vCPU ID instead of a vCPU index by host. It's indicated
by 'struct kvm_vcpu' as below.
struct kvm_vcpu {
:
int vcpu_id; /* id given by userspace at creation */
int vcpu_idx; /* index into kvm->vcpu_array */
};
Function kvm_arch_vcpu_id() converts the vCPU instance or vCPU index to
the architecrual vCPU ID. All architectures except x86 simply returns
vCPU index (CPUState::cpu_index) as the architecrural vCPU ID. x86 returns
the APIC ID. Treating them equally seems to break x86.
> static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> {
> KVMState *s = kvm_state;
> long mmap_size;
> - struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
>
> DPRINTF("kvm_destroy_vcpu\n");
> @@ -353,10 +392,7 @@ static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> }
> }
>
> - vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
> - vcpu->vcpu_id = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
> - vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
> - QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu, node);
> + kvm_park_vcpu(cpu);
> err:
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -369,7 +405,7 @@ void kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> }
> }
>
> -static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned long vcpu_id)
> +static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, int vcpu_id)
> {
> struct KVMParkedVcpu *cpu;
>
> @@ -384,7 +420,7 @@ static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned long vcpu_id)
> }
> }
>
> - return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)vcpu_id);
> + return -1;
> }
>
Why we have -1 here. -ENOENT seems more descriptive?
> int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
> @@ -395,19 +431,14 @@ int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
>
> trace_kvm_init_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
>
> - ret = kvm_get_vcpu(s, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
> + ret = kvm_create_vcpu(cpu);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_get_vcpu failed (%lu)",
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> + "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_create_vcpu failed (%lu)",
> kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
> goto err;
> }
>
> - cpu->kvm_fd = ret;
> - cpu->kvm_state = s;
> - cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
> - cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
> - cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
> -
> mmap_size = kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_VCPU_MMAP_SIZE, 0);
> if (mmap_size < 0) {
> ret = mmap_size;
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index ee9025f8e9..785f3ed083 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -464,6 +464,20 @@ void kvm_set_sigmask_len(KVMState *s, unsigned int sigmask_len);
>
> int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,
> hwaddr *phys_addr);
> +/**
> + * kvm_create_vcpu - Gets a parked KVM vCPU or creates a KVM vCPU
> + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which KVM vCPU has to be created/fetched.
> + *
> + * @returns: 0 when success, errno (<0) when failed.
> + */
> +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
> +/**
> + * kvm_park_vcpu - Gets a parked KVM vCPU if it exists
> + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which parked KVM vCPU has to be fetched.
> + *
> + * @returns: kvm_fd (>0) when success, -1 when failed.
> + */
> +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
>
> #endif /* NEED_CPU_H */
>
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-02 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-30 0:19 [PATCH V2 00/10] Add architecture agnostic code to support vCPU Hotplug Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation, parking} code Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation,parking} code Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 15:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:05 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:05 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:51 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 12:27 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 12:27 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-02 23:17 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2023-10-03 11:22 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:22 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] hw/acpi: Move CPU ctrl-dev MMIO region len macro to common header file Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 15:54 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 15:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-02 23:19 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] hw/acpi: Add ACPI CPU hotplug init stub Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:27 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:27 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-02 23:25 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:28 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:28 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/acpi: Init GED framework with cpu hotplug events Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:29 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:29 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-02 23:28 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:30 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:30 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] hw/acpi: Update CPUs AML with cpu-(ctrl)dev change Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 16:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:31 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:31 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 0:09 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:33 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:33 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] hw/acpi: Update GED _EVT method AML with cpu scan Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:14 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 16:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:53 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 12:13 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 12:13 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 0:10 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] hw/acpi: Update ACPI GED framework to support vCPU Hotplug Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:44 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:44 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 0:11 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:45 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:45 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] physmem: Add helper function to destroy CPU AddressSpace Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:20 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-02 16:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:46 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:46 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 1:36 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:54 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:54 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-04 10:48 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-04 10:48 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] gdbstub: Add helper function to unregister GDB register space Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 3:16 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:56 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:56 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] target/arm/kvm: Write CPU state back to KVM on reset Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 3:54 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8861b68-5e04-5127-5c0f-77816401741b@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jiakernel2@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=karl.heubaum@oracle.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lixianglai@loongson.cn \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=salil.mehta@opnsrc.net \
--cc=vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).