From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIbY7-0005DX-QB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 11:39:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIbY3-0001Hb-W6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 11:39:49 -0400 References: <20181031002526.14262-1-contrib@steffen-goertz.de> <20181031002526.14262-3-contrib@steffen-goertz.de> <93e1b8e1-c8f2-6a61-122a-8354b933782c@mail.ru> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Steffen_G=c3=b6rtz?= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 11:39:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <93e1b8e1-c8f2-6a61-122a-8354b933782c@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/13] arm: Add header to host common definition for nRF51 SOC peripherals List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Julia Suvorova , =?UTF-8?Q?Steffen_G=c3=b6rtz?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Joel Stanley , Jim Mussared , Peter Maydell , "open list:NRF51" Hi Julia, > Why do we need an extra file for this? nrf51_soc.h seemed like a good fit. nrf51_soc.h is not included in the peripheral devices. It would be possible to put the definitions into nrf51_soc.h but i just did not want to mix up the dependency directions. > What's the purpose of renaming? To avoid name conflicts down the road. Cheers, Steffen