From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C656CC433E0 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4245422BEA for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4245422BEA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53988 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1WDx-0002KT-6W for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:13:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1WDB-0001jx-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:12:57 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:37381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1WD8-0008SQ-7K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:12:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610982773; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OjettLIT0srMQXm6M8vqujMH7mAhY+HWU2AczcxjVhs=; b=Y3FEXTbCDY7xADfskwER86svBJuBOMKfYfhp4kwV/BZ/Y9Zy6W+jYspD+RaKuGrSEjk1vl QG9h1JIvVSpuGXhaKqalypZjdEfLhKCsl7xQGeVak+GSFqqlDKCtxQMuhoxD4QYeNWSzX+ 8mqUhkdFoRiaYT2TYmZ8HDGt0JScCtI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-457-LT9BCj9vPFKexSP63dSzXw-1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:12:51 -0500 X-MC-Unique: LT9BCj9vPFKexSP63dSzXw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17C758066E5; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-112-189.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.189]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCB410016FA; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gitlab-ci: Add alpine to pipeline To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= References: <20210118063808.12471-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118063808.12471-10-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118101159.GC1789637@redhat.com> <307dea8e-148e-6666-c6f1-5cc66a54a7af@redhat.com> <20210118145016.GC1799018@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:12:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210118145016.GC1799018@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.175, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.194, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Laurent Vivier , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Viktor Prutyanov , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Alistair Francis , BALATON Zoltan via , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Greg Kurz , Max Reitz , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Kevin Wolf , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 18/01/2021 15.50, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 18/01/2021 14.37, Jiaxun Yang wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 6:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: >>>>> We only run build test and check-acceptance as their are too many >>>>> failures in checks due to minor string mismatch. >>>> >>>> Can you give real examples of what's broken here, as that sounds >>>> rather suspicious, and I'm not convinced it should be ignored. >>> >>> Mostly Input/Output error vs I/O Error. >> >> Right, out of curiosity, I also gave it a try: >> >> https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/-/jobs/969225330 >> >> Apart from the "I/O Error" vs. "Input/Output Error" difference, there also >> seems to be a problem with "sed" in some of the tests. > > The "sed" thing sounds like something that ought to be investigated > from a portability POV rather than ignored. The weird thing is that we explicitly test for GNU sed in tests/check-block.sh and skip the iotests if it's not available... so I'm a little bit surprised that the iotests are run here with an apparently different version of sed...? Thomas