qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Michael Roth" <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Shaoqin Huang" <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	"Eric Auger" <eauger@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Sebastian Ott" <sebott@redhat.com>,
	"Gavin Shan" <gshan@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, "Yi Lai" <yi1.lai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] i386/kvm: Support fixed counter in KVM PMU filter
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 15:35:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aA3eVdwujSmqKAKu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a93fa6b-d38d-48ac-9cde-488765238247@linaro.org>

> >   static void kvm_pmu_filter_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> >   {
> >       object_class_property_add_enum(oc, "action", "KvmPmuFilterAction",
> > @@ -116,6 +139,14 @@ static void kvm_pmu_filter_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> >                                 NULL, NULL);
> >       object_class_property_set_description(oc, "events",
> >                                             "KVM PMU event list");
> > +
> > +    object_class_property_add(oc, "x86-fixed-counter", "uint32_t",
> > +                              kvm_pmu_filter_get_fixed_counter,
> > +                              kvm_pmu_filter_set_fixed_counter,
> > +                              NULL, NULL);
> > +    object_class_property_set_description(oc, "x86-fixed-counter",
> > +                                          "Enablement bitmap of "
> > +                                          "x86 PMU fixed counter");
> 
> Adding that x86-specific field to all architectures is a bit dubious.

Similarly, do you think that it would be a good idea to wrap x86 related
codes in "#if defined(TARGET_I386)"? Like I said in this reply:

https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/aA3TeaYG9mNMdEiW@intel.com/



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-27  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09  8:26 [PATCH 0/5] accel/kvm: Support KVM PMU filter Zhao Liu
2025-04-09  8:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] qapi/qom: Introduce kvm-pmu-filter object Zhao Liu
2025-04-10 14:21   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11  4:03     ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-11  4:38       ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11  6:34         ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-16  8:17           ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-24  6:33             ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-25 10:35               ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-04-27  7:26                 ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-24 12:18   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-24 15:34     ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-25  9:19   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-09  8:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] i386/kvm: Support basic KVM PMU filter Zhao Liu
2025-04-25  9:19   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-27  8:34     ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-28  6:12       ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-28 14:12         ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-09  8:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] i386/kvm: Support event with select & umask format in " Zhao Liu
2025-04-25  9:33   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-27  6:49     ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-28  7:19       ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-28 14:42         ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-28 16:24           ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-29  6:24             ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-09  8:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] i386/kvm: Support event with masked entry " Zhao Liu
2025-04-25  9:37   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-09  8:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] i386/kvm: Support fixed counter " Zhao Liu
2025-04-24  8:17   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-04-24 15:35     ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-25 10:32   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-04-27  7:35     ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2025-04-15  7:49 ` [PATCH 0/5] accel/kvm: Support " Shaoqin Huang
2025-04-15  9:59   ` Zhao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aA3eVdwujSmqKAKu@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eauger@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sebott@redhat.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).