From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC16C369AB for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u7yHz-0005lg-8G; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:14:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u7yHw-0005l1-B6; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:14:56 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.19]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1u7yHu-0008KM-Mm; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:14:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1745507695; x=1777043695; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=NnaqS19Vj5IEgZGuniBgVWHY2Bm3xNzNuM4PHOb+jI0=; b=hxtCHNM/OVNfBu01oGiMwaXALP0qgywyd/UKla4TwN4Go7F0VePM53pJ iU1VrlwT5JbNMYAEivzg36iQxgrI8+wQRtzzQw0oFp1PqY/rdGwxAG7NS ODrOb6/JTCREuoynRkV6pTrcsmRMS+mwX4xbfTJ21gKiAH9drAyYQ69Na saU+rrOm+tBxyeTKVhyAG+2YunNbT9OqMzJa6qeHKGuiP3SK4KHJzQGWC xza+0TPbgI2D2di1hXmepkKDKTlEOZgCnv3feda2jXUOX/tIOXYSTRqTx bOPaOY9f/grWblZ6p61KZV/EsMATXc2FQ3eeIR8Qf66KmjDdWwRHxBf2b g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rPp2TIKnRRGubvFwvBbs8w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gKdtoUftRMCyzMSTjQZLhg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11413"; a="47035261" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,236,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="47035261" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2025 08:14:52 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gU9yJX50QmeV2dpOjNeazQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Oy1pJe+FTEGiowulyfquZg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,236,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="132637484" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2025 08:14:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 23:35:43 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: "Mi, Dapeng" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Michael Roth , Daniel P =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Eduardo Habkost , Marcelo Tosatti , Shaoqin Huang , Eric Auger , Peter Maydell , Laurent Vivier , Thomas Huth , Sebastian Ott , Gavin Shan , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Dapeng Mi , Yi Lai Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] i386/kvm: Support fixed counter in KVM PMU filter Message-ID: References: <20250409082649.14733-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <20250409082649.14733-6-zhao1.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.19; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -51 X-Spam_score: -5.2 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.84, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org > > /** > > * KVMPMUFilter: > > - * @action: action that KVM PMU filter will take for selected PMU events. > > + * @action: action that KVM PMU filter will take for selected PMU events > > + * and counters. > > Maybe more accurate "fixed counters". Yes, will fix. Thanks, Zhao