qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: gerben@altlinux.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, hreitz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	sdl.qemu@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] qemu-img: fix offset calculation in bench
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:04:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAuyq89aWJEl9Heg@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327162423.25154-3-gerben@altlinux.org>

Am 27.03.2025 um 17:24 hat gerben@altlinux.org geschrieben:
> From: Denis Rastyogin <gerben@altlinux.org>
> 
> This error was discovered by fuzzing qemu-img.
> 
> The current offset calculation leads to an EIO error
> in block/block-backend.c: blk_check_byte_request():
> 
>  if (offset > len || len - offset < bytes) {
>      return -EIO;
>  }
> 
> This triggers the error message:
> "qemu-img: Failed request: Input/output error".
> 
> Example of the issue:
>  offset: 260076
>  len: 260096
>  bytes: 4096
> 
> This fix ensures that offset remains within a valid range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Rastyogin <gerben@altlinux.org>
> ---
>  qemu-img.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
> index 2044c22a4c..71c9fe496f 100644
> --- a/qemu-img.c
> +++ b/qemu-img.c
> @@ -4491,7 +4491,7 @@ static void bench_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
>          if (b->image_size == 0) {
>              b->offset = 0;
>          } else {
> -            b->offset %= b->image_size;
> +            b->offset %= b->image_size - b->bufsize;

The approach makes sense in principle, but you just introduced a new
division by zero here if image_size == bufsize (in this case we want to
use 0 as the new offset).

We probably also don't want to allow this to become negative.

Kevin



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-25 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-27 16:24 [PATCH 0/4] Fix qemu-img bench issues and improve checks gerben
2025-03-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] qemu-img: fix division by zero in bench_cb() for zero-sized gerben
2025-03-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] qemu-img: fix offset calculation in bench gerben
2025-04-25 16:04   ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2025-03-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] qemu-img: prevent stack overflow in bench by using bottom half gerben
2025-04-25 16:08   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-03-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] qemu-img: improve queue depth validation in img_bench gerben
2025-04-25 16:10   ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAuyq89aWJEl9Heg@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=gerben@altlinux.org \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sdl.qemu@linuxtesting.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).