From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] hw/core/cpu-common: Don't init gdbstub until cpu_exec_realizefn()
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:03:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBD4WuIP0MJ0OVpu@zapote> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429132200.605611-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 02:21:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Currently we call gdb_init_cpu() in cpu_common_initfn(), which is
> very early in the CPU object's init->realize creation sequence. In
> particular this happens before the architecture-specific subclass's
> init fn has even run. This means that gdb_init_cpu() can only do
> things that depend strictly on the class, not on the object, because
> the CPUState* that it is passed is currently half-initialized.
>
> In commit a1f728ecc90cf6c6 we accidentally broke this rule, by adding
> a call to the gdb_get_core_xml_file method which takes the CPUState.
> At the moment we get away with this because the only implementation
> doesn't actually look at the pointer it is passed. However the whole
> reason we created that method was so that we could make the "which
> XML file?" decision based on a property of the CPU object, and we
> currently can't change the Arm implementation of the method to do
> what we want without causing wrong behaviour or a crash.
>
> The ordering restrictions here are:
> * we must call gdb_init_cpu before:
> - any call to gdb_register_coprocessor()
> - any use of the gdb_num_regs field (this is only used
> in code that's about to call gdb_register_coprocessor()
> and wants to know the first register number of the
> set of registers it's about to add)
> * we must call gdb_init_cpu after CPU properties have been
> set, which is to say somewhere in realize
>
> The function cpu_exec_realizefn() meets both of these requirements,
> as it is called by the architecture-specific CPU realize function
> early in realize, before any calls ot gdb_register_coprocessor().
> Move the gdb_init_cpu() call to there.
Sounds good to me:
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/core/cpu-common.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/cpu-common.c b/hw/core/cpu-common.c
> index 92c40b6bf83..39e674aca21 100644
> --- a/hw/core/cpu-common.c
> +++ b/hw/core/cpu-common.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ bool cpu_exec_realizefn(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
> return false;
> }
>
> + gdb_init_cpu(cpu);
> +
> /* Wait until cpu initialization complete before exposing cpu. */
> cpu_list_add(cpu);
>
> @@ -304,7 +306,6 @@ static void cpu_common_initfn(Object *obj)
> /* cache the cpu class for the hotpath */
> cpu->cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>
> - gdb_init_cpu(cpu);
> cpu->cpu_index = UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX;
> cpu->cluster_index = UNASSIGNED_CLUSTER_INDEX;
> cpu->as = NULL;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 13:21 [PATCH v2 0/7] target/arm: Remove TYPE_AARCH64_CPU class Peter Maydell
2025-04-29 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] target/microblaze: Use 'obj' in DEVICE() casts in mb_cpu_initfn() Peter Maydell
2025-04-29 14:59 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-04-29 15:59 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2025-04-30 17:19 ` Richard Henderson
2025-04-29 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] target/microblaze: Delay gdb_register_coprocessor() to realize Peter Maydell
2025-04-29 16:00 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2025-04-30 17:19 ` Richard Henderson
2025-05-01 19:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-04-29 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] hw/core/cpu-common: Don't init gdbstub until cpu_exec_realizefn() Peter Maydell
2025-04-29 16:03 ` Edgar E. Iglesias [this message]
2025-04-30 17:19 ` Richard Henderson
2025-05-01 13:09 ` Alex Bennée
2025-05-01 19:39 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-04-29 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] target/arm: Present AArch64 gdbstub based on ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64 Peter Maydell
2025-04-30 17:19 ` Richard Henderson
2025-04-29 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] target/arm: Move aarch64 CPU property code to TYPE_ARM_CPU Peter Maydell
2025-04-30 17:21 ` Richard Henderson
2025-04-29 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] target/arm/kvm: don't check TYPE_AARCH64_CPU Peter Maydell
2025-04-30 17:21 ` Richard Henderson
2025-04-29 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] target/arm: Remove TYPE_AARCH64_CPU Peter Maydell
2025-04-30 17:21 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBD4WuIP0MJ0OVpu@zapote \
--to=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).