From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Pierrick Bouvier" <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] qapi: Make CpuModelExpansionInfo::deprecated-props optional and generic
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:41:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCM-ECjLAPjr5ITz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r00sd6sv.fsf@pond.sub.org>
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 02:38:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Copying my review from the initial posting:
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> >
> > We'd like to have some unified QAPI schema. Having a structure field
> > conditional to a target being built in is not very practical.
> >
> > While @deprecated-props is only used by s390x target, it is generic
> > enough and could be used by other targets (assuming we expand
> > CpuModelExpansionType enum values).
> >
> > Let's always include this field, regardless of the target, but
> > make it optional.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > qapi/machine-target.json | 7 +++----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/qapi/machine-target.json b/qapi/machine-target.json
> > index 541f93eeb7..3b109b4af8 100644
> > --- a/qapi/machine-target.json
> > +++ b/qapi/machine-target.json
> > @@ -244,19 +244,18 @@
> > #
> > # @model: the expanded CpuModelInfo.
> > #
> > -# @deprecated-props: a list of properties that are flagged as
> > +# @deprecated-props: an optional list of properties that are flagged as
> > # deprecated by the CPU vendor. The list depends on the
> > # CpuModelExpansionType: "static" properties are a subset of the
> > # enabled-properties for the expanded model; "full" properties are
> > # a set of properties that are deprecated across all models for
> > -# the architecture. (since: 9.1).
> > +# the architecture. (since: 10.1 -- since 9.1 on s390x --).
> > #
> > # Since: 2.8
> > ##
> > { 'struct': 'CpuModelExpansionInfo',
> > 'data': { 'model': 'CpuModelInfo',
> > - 'deprecated-props' : { 'type': ['str'],
> > - 'if': 'TARGET_S390X' } },
> > + '*deprecated-props' : { 'type': ['str'] } },
>
> Make this
>
> '*deprecated-props' : ['str'] },
>
> please.
>
> When I see "optional array", I wonder about the difference between
> "absent" and "present and empty". The doc comment doesn't quite explain
> it. I figure "present and empty" means empty, while "absent" means we
> don't know / not implemented.
>
> Is the difference useful?
I'm doubtful that the difference is useful.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 13:58 [PATCH RFC 00/10] qapi: remove all TARGET_* conditionals from the schema Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 01/10] qapi: expose rtc-reset-reinjection command unconditionally Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-10 9:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-12 18:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-13 0:54 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 1:09 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 7:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 02/10] qapi: expand docs for SEV commands Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-13 12:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 12:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 03/10] qapi: make SEV commands unconditionally available Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 04/10] qapi: expose query-gic-capability command unconditionally Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 05/10] qapi: make SGX commands unconditionally available Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 06/10] qapi: make Xen event " Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 15:01 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-05-08 17:48 ` David Woodhouse
2025-05-08 17:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 19:08 ` David Woodhouse
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] qapi: remove the misc-target.json file Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 08/10] qapi: Make CpuModelExpansionInfo::deprecated-props optional and generic Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-13 12:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 12:41 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 09/10] qapi: make most CPU commands unconditionally available Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 20:55 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 12:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 16:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/10] qapi: make s390x specific " Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 14:56 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] qapi: remove all TARGET_* conditionals from the schema Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-05-08 14:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-08 21:09 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-09 9:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-09 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-09 13:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-10 6:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-12 18:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-10 9:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-12 18:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-12 20:09 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 7:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-13 14:36 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-05-13 14:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCM-ECjLAPjr5ITz@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).